Where Can a MAP Degree Take Your License?

A licensure-portability guide for Seattle University MAP graduates, classes of 2022–2024 (the 72-quarter-credit program)
Maintained by Matt Sorg (MAP alum, WA LMHC) - corrections and validations to matt@matthewsorg.com. Researched and assembled with Claude. · Version 2.22.2 · first built 2026-08-18, revised continuously — the changelog is the history
WHO THIS IS FOR: license portability for Seattle University MAP graduates holding, or working toward, the Washington LMHC — calibrated to the 72-quarter-credit curriculum eras (2012–2024). Alumni of other eras: your math differs. Graduates of the 90-quarter curriculum (2024-25 onward) clear most of the credit floors these entries treat as walls, and anyone fully licensed five or more years often has easier doors than the headline tiers — the five-year lanes are flagged inside the entries. Everything here is informational, not legal advice; quoted board-staff answers are informal. Verify with the board before filing anything — each card's footer shows how current that entry is.

If you graduated from Seattle University’s MA in Psychology (existential-phenomenological) program between 2022 and 2024, your degree is 72 quarter credits (48 semester hours), from a regionally accredited university, not from a CACREP-accredited counseling program. Those three facts determine where your Washington license can travel more than anything else on your transcript. This guide checks every U.S. state, DC, and British Columbia against the MAP degree, with Washington as the home state: which jurisdictions are open now, which open after one to five years, which need added coursework, and which are closed.

The situation we all share

Washington joined the Counseling Compact effective July 23, 2023 (SHB 1069; ch. 18.17 RCW). The compact’s legacy rule exempts counselors who were independently licensed before their state joined. No MAP grad from these classes could hold a full LMHC by mid-2023—the post-degree supervised-hours runway makes it impossible. The whole cohort is outside the legacy exemption.

Washington’s statute (RCW 18.225.090(1)(b)(i)(B)) makes related-discipline licensees compact-ineligible unless their graduate coursework reaches 60 semester / 90 quarter hours covering nine content areas. At 72 quarter hours, every MAP grad is 18 quarter hours short regardless of electives. Electives change your content gaps; nothing changes the total gap.

As of August 2026 the compact is operational in only seven states, the seventh being Arkansas (joined July 30, 2026; re-checked 2026-08-20). Washington has opened no implementing rulemaking (re-verified 2026-08-19: DOH’s counselor rules-in-progress page lists three filings, all adopted, none touching the compact, and DOH’s own compact page still says applications are ‘expected to open in 2025’). Privileges from a Washington home state are late 2027 at the earliest. The state-by-state doors below are what to plan around.

Four problems, kept separate: Keep four problems separate as you read. Problem one: the total-hours gap—72 quarter is 18 short of the 90-quarter/60-semester standard used by the compact and several states, and only added graduate credit closes it. Problem two: content gaps—specific missing courses (career is the most demanded), which vary person to person and are cheap to cure one course at a time. Problem three: your exam—the NCE and the NCMHCE split the map into clusters, no amount of coursework converts one into the other, and for a handful of states (Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Maine’s clinical tier, Tennessee) the NCMHCE is the price of entry. The wall runs the other way too: Pennsylvania and Hawaii take only the NCE, so NCMHCE-holders have their own short list of exam-gated states. Unlike accreditation, an exam can be acquired with a test sitting—if your target state demands the one you didn’t take, that is a scheduling problem. Problem four: your program’s accreditation—the only problem you cannot solve after the fact. The MAP holds neither CACREP nor MPCAC accreditation (checked against both organizations’ directories, August 19, 2026), and accreditation attaches to the program, not to you: no added coursework, hours, or exam confers it afterward. Where a state demands an accredited program—North Carolina is the clearest case—that state is closed. There is nothing to self-audit here; this problem is shared by the whole cohort equally, and the accreditation section below explains why it argues for moving early.

Audit yourself first

Three things vary person to person and change which entries apply to you. Check them against your own records before reading the states.

Your electives

MAP electives ran through special-topics slots and varied by year—career development, substance use, hermeneutics, trauma, human growth, and others. The content areas state boards and NBCC actually ask about: career/lifestyle development, addictions/substance use, human growth & development, appraisal/tests & measurements, psychopharmacology, human sexuality, quantitative research methods, and crisis. Pull your transcript and mark which you have. Wherever this guide says a state ‘needs a career course (if you lack one),’ check your own list. If you took the career elective, you already clear the single most-demanded area—but you are still 18 quarter hours short of the compact total.

Your exam

Washington accepted more than one exam. If you passed the NCE, most of the entries below read as written. If you passed the NCMHCE instead—a minority of the cohort, but real—the picture changes: Indiana, New York, Massachusetts, Maine, and Tennessee all require the NCMHCE specifically (Rhode Island does too, but its bars are structural—the exam no longer buys entry there); Illinois’s clinical tier and Vermont’s standard path want both exams (and Utah reserves discretion to demand both). Each state entry names its exam. If you passed only the NCMHCE, a handful of NCE-keyed states become harder—check the entry. And the reverse for NCMHCE-holders: Pennsylvania and Hawaii take only the NCE, so for you those two are exam-gated the way Indiana is for NCE-holders. Each entry carries an exam badge showing which direction it runs.

Your license date and stage

Every ‘opens at’ below is a formula, not a date: your full-LMHC issuance date plus one, two, three, or five years. Look up your issuance date on the DOH provider-credential search and do the math. Still an LMHCA? See the associate box below—nearly every door here presumes the full license, and whether associate-era practice counts toward any state’s experience clock is tracked there with board answers rather than guesses.

Still an LMHCA? Read the entries with one adjustment: every licensure door in this guide presumes the full LMHC, and the telehealth registrations presume it too. What is open to you now: British Columbia’s RCC, which keys to the degree rather than the license (immigration is its own project); the NCC groundwork (filing the application so NBCC’s own coursework review names your gaps, and the career course if it says you need one); and records hygiene, because two jurisdictions have live open questions about whether associate-era practice counts toward their experience clocks (Florida’s two-of-four years and Vermont’s fast-track clock; Louisiana, Oregon, and Arizona answered no—full license only—as did Vermont’s standard route, and Virginia deleted its duration test in July 2026). Keep your supervision log clean and get your internship clock hours documented by the program while staff still remember you.
Reading the status labels: Every entry carries a status showing how far past paper its pathway has been tested: HYPOTHESIS (paper-verified only), CORROBORATED (a board answered an inquiry — quoted with date), VALIDATED (a real application proved the pathway), FILED · PENDING (an application is in adjudication). Where board practice diverges from statute text, the conflict is noted in the entry.

The country at a glance

A green state means the door is open to file with a full license in hand — every one still carries conditions in its card, and filing is not licensure: boards take weeks to months to process even clean applications. Click or tab to any state — or, for the small eastern states, its labeled callout — to jump to its entry; the entries below are the accessible text of this map.

AKALARAZCACOFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMEMIMNMOMSMTNCNDNENMNVNYOHOKORPASCSDTNTXUTVAWAWIWVWYCTDCDEMAMDNHNJRIVTBRITISH COLUMBIA (inset)
Open now (see conditions)License date + 1 yearLicense date + 2 yearsLicense date + 3–4 yearsLicense date + 5 yearsCoursework onlyCoursework + moreClosed to this degree (compact someday, for most)Washington (home)= telehealth registration availableCard badges: plum = an exam wall (the badge names whose) · green = your exam is not checked at all, or either exam works · no badge = the exam picture is unsettled (see the entry) or the state is closed

Practicing into states from Washington: telehealth registrations and the compact

Licensure and permission to practice into a state are different things, and this section holds everything in the second category. Six states will register an out-of-state licensee to serve their residents by telehealth, with no license in that state. The Counseling Compact belongs here too, because for this cohort that is what it really is: a privilege lets you practice into member states, in person or by telehealth, only while Washington remains your home state. It is never a path to moving somewhere. Everything below presumes the full, unencumbered WA LMHC.

VALIDATED: Validated, start to finish: a cohort member applied in late July 2026 and the registration was issued 2026-08-06, about two weeks later.
The path

A $35 registration with Idaho's licensing division that lets you see Idaho-located clients from your Washington office. No exam, no transcript review, no Idaho license. Telehealth only: no in-person work in Idaho, and the registration never converts into a license.

When it opens

Now, with a full unencumbered WA license.

Exam

None.

Education

None reviewed.

Where this law comes from

Idaho Code §54-5714 was added to the Idaho Virtual Care Access Act (Title 54, ch. 57) by 2023 Idaho Session Laws ch. 142, §1; the statute's official published text shows no separate effective-date clause beyond that 2023 enactment.

Before acting
  • Non-transferable, and it expires on a cycle rather than renewing, so calendar the reapplication.
  • Your scope in Idaho is capped at what your WA license allows.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the statute and the DOPL registration form were read directly, and the pathway has been used

  • Idaho Code §54-5714, interstate telehealth registration for mental and behavioral health (Idaho Virtual Care Access Act, Title 54 ch. 57) — confirms no Idaho license required, $35 registration, telehealth only, never converts to licensure — https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/title54/t54ch57/sect54-5714/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • Idaho DOPL, Board of Professional Counselors and Marriage & Family Therapists — Interstate Mental or Behavioral Telehealth Registration ($35, non-renewable) — https://dopl.idaho.gov/cou/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • Registration issued to a cohort member 2026-08-06 — non-public correspondence and applicant experience; no public URL
Interstate telehealth registration (Idaho Code 54-5714) · Idaho Code 54-5714
board answered 2026-08-06 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Registers an out-of-state licensee to serve Florida clients by telehealth with no Florida license. Requires an active unencumbered license, a Florida registered agent for service of process, and professional liability coverage. No in-person services in Florida and no Florida office.

When it opens

Now, with a full unencumbered WA license and no discipline in the past five years.

Exam

None.

Education

None reviewed.

Before acting
  • If the full Florida license lands by endorsement, the registration is unnecessary; do not buy both.
  • The registered-agent requirement means a small ongoing cost even at zero clients.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the statute was read directly

Out-of-state telehealth provider registration (Fla. Stat. 456.47) · Fla. Stat. 456.47
entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Registers an out-of-state behavioral health licensee to serve Arizona clients by telehealth. Requires proof of all licenses, professional liability insurance, and an Arizona statutory agent; the fee is board-set and unpublished in the rules. Annual renewal plus an annual report of Arizona patient counts. Telehealth only.

When it opens

Now, with a full unencumbered WA license and no disciplinary history anywhere (stricter than the licensure routes).

Exam

None.

Education

None reviewed.

Before acting
  • You may not need it at all: Arizona exempts anyone with fewer than ten Arizona telehealth encounters a calendar year, and separately allows up to ninety days of practice a year with client disclosure (A.R.S. 32-3271(A)(2)).
  • Confirm the fee with the board before filing; the widely quoted $600 belongs to the psychology board.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: statute read directly during research

Out-of-state telehealth registration (A.R.S. 36-3606) · A.R.S. 36-3606
entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

A 2025 statute creating an interstate telehealth registration for out-of-state licensees to serve West Virginia clients. The statute is real; whether the counseling board has implemented the registration process is not confirmed.

When it opens

On paper, now; in practice, once the board stands the process up.

Exam

None per the statute.

Education

None per the statute.

Where this law comes from

W. Va. Code §30-1-26 was most recently amended by Senate Bill 299 of the 2025 Regular Session, per the bill-history record printed on the WV Legislature's official code page; that page does not display the bill's specific effective date.

Before acting
  • Confirm implementation with the board before relying on it; their website has lagged the 2025 statutes before.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: §30-1-26 read in full 2026-08-20 — behavioral medicine exempt from the 12-month in-person rule; no physical WV practice without full licensure

  • W. Va. Code §30-1-26 (interstate telehealth registration for out-of-state practitioners, including licensed professional counselors, serving WV patients by telehealth; most recently amended by 2025 Regular Session SB 299 per the code page's bill-history record; the statute itself does not address board implementation status) — https://code.wvlegislature.gov/30-1-26/ (verified 2026-08-19)
Interstate telehealth registration (W.Va. Code 30-1-26, 2025) · W.Va. Code 30-1-26
sources read 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: The compact-state bar is not just a literal reading: Delaware's own application page restates it plainly (verified 2026-08-19). Treat this registration as closed to Washington licensees unless the board says otherwise.
The path

Registers an out-of-state licensee to serve Delaware clients by telehealth without a Delaware license. Carries one trap for this cohort: read literally, the eligibility provision (24 Del. C. §6002(c)) bars licensees of any state that has enacted a compact Delaware participates in — and Washington has, even though no privileges flow yet. A full read of chapter 60 adds the counterweight: §6005(b) is a mental-health-specific exception letting a provider licensed in another jurisdiction treat Delaware residents by telehealth on a Medical Request Form plus whatever registration the Division establishes — and it contains no compact-state bar. Whether the Division's registration program implements §6002(c) (the bar) or §6005(b) (no bar) is the question that decides the trap.

When it opens

Ask first: whether the compact-state bar is applied literally decides everything.

Exam

None.

Education

None reviewed.

Where this law comes from

The operative Delaware provision, 24 Del. C. §6002(c), was enacted as 83 Del. Laws c. 52, §4 and amended by 83 Del. Laws c. 484, §1; no separate later act specifically adding the compact-state bar was located.

Before acting
  • The bar is confirmed by the regulator's own application page: an applicant must 'not be actively licensed in a state that has enacted a compact in which Delaware participates.' Washington has. On the official language, a Washington LMHC does not qualify — ask only if you want to test a narrower reading.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: 24 Del. C. ch. 60 read in full 2026-08-20 — §6002(c)'s registration path is textually limited to providers from states that have NOT adopted an applicable compact, supporting the entry's literal-reading trap; §6005(b)'s mental-health exception carries no such bar. Which section the Division's registration implements is open.

Mental health interstate telehealth registration (24 Del. C. 6003) · 24 Del. C. §6002(c) (eligibility bar), ch. 60 generally
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Found 2026-08-20 in the board-provided licensing guide and verified against the regulator's FAQ the same day. Paper-verified only — the registration window opened in January 2026 and no one in this cohort has filed.
The path

New in 2026 and verified on the regulator's own pages: Colorado registers out-of-state health-care providers — mental health providers expressly included — to serve Colorado clients by telehealth without any Colorado license (SB24-141 framework, registrations open January 1, 2026). The requirements are an application and fee, a valid out-of-state credential, a clean disciplinary record for the five years before applying, Colorado's mental-health jurisprudence exam, and disclosure duties; the counselor licensing guide adds a telehealth-only attestation and a registered agent in Colorado.

When it opens

Open now, from Washington, with the full license in hand.

Exam

Colorado Mental Health Jurisprudence Exam if passage is required of substantially-similar Colorado licensees (the FAQ's own conditional phrasing — for mental health professions it is, so plan on it). No national exam re-tested.

Education

Not reviewed — the registration rides entirely on the out-of-state credential.

Where this law comes from

SB24-141 (2024) created the out-of-state telehealth registration; 2025 legislation expanded the covered professions, and registrations opened January 1, 2026 per the Division's FAQ.

Before acting
  • Telehealth only, strictly: in-person services in Colorado are prohibited on this registration, and it never converts to residency rights — moving to Colorado means the endorsement route.
  • Real operational duties attach: patient-location and provider-location disclosures, a written emergency protocol with local crisis-resource lists for where the client sits, and staying on the line during an emergency until help arrives.
  • Five-year clean-discipline lookback; any restriction, discipline, or malpractice settlement must be disclosed.
  • Untested by this cohort — registrations only opened this year; treat processing details (fees, the registered-agent mechanics) as unverified until someone files.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the regulator's telehealth FAQ and the board's licensing guide were both read directly

  • Colorado DPO, Out-of-State Telehealth Providers FAQ (SB24-141; registrations available to mental health providers beginning 2026-01-01; requirements, prohibitions, emergency-protocol duties; read in full) — https://dpo.colorado.gov/TelehealthFAQ (verified 2026-08-20)
  • Colorado DPO, Professional Counselor Licensing Guide (rev. Feb 2025) — telehealth licensure section: jurisprudence exam, verification of another active license, telehealth-only attestation, Colorado registered agent (provided by the board's license specialist 2026-08-20)
  • SB24-141, Out-of-State Telehealth Providers — https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-141 (verified 2026-08-20)
Out-of-State Telehealth Registration · SB24-141 (2024); C.R.S. §12-30-124 framework
entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Nobody in the cohort can use this yet: the 18-quarter gap blocks eligibility, Washington has not gone live, and the two together put compact privileges in late 2027 at the earliest even for someone who finishes the coursework now. [Query sent to Washington DOH 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: go-live timeline, rulemaking status, and whether post-degree coursework can supplement toward the 90-quarter education requirement.]
The path

The cohort's shared math: privileges require the home-state license to rest on 90 quarter / 60 semester hours covering nine areas — every MAP grad is 18 quarter hours short, and career development is the most commonly missing area. The exam is not a problem (NCE or NCMHCE both satisfy the commission). Cure = added graduate coursework to 90 quarter including your missing areas.

When it opens

After (1) your ~18-quarter cure, (2) Washington flags you compact-eligible (mechanism unpublished — DOH has opened no rulemaking), and (3) WA goes live (absent from every announcement; late 2027 at the earliest). Payoff: the 40 member states as they activate (Pennsylvania the newest, enacted July 2026), at modest per-state fees, without individual applications.

Exam

NCE or NCMHCE.

Education

The 'or includes 60 semester/90 quarter hours of graduate coursework' phrasing in Washington's statute is a genuine textual argument that post-degree supplementation counts. Unconfirmed for the compact clause specifically, but the department's posture leans that way: DOH's own licensure rules expressly let related-degree holders complete supplemental coursework to cure missing program equivalencies (WAC 246-809-220(3), as amended May 2025). The DOH counselor program office is the place to ask, and one graduate's written answer serves everyone.

Where this law comes from

Washington's Counseling Compact statute — ch. 18.17 RCW, together with the related-discipline eligibility clause at RCW 18.225.090 — was enacted by Substitute House Bill 1069, chapter 58, Laws of 2023, effective July 23, 2023.

Before acting
  • A privilege covers practicing into member states while Washington remains your primary residence — it is never a relocation path.
  • Licenses obtained via some states' universal-recognition routes are excluded from anchoring privileges.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

Privilege to practice (member states) · RCW 18.225.090(1)(b)(i)(B); ch. 18.17 RCW; counselingcompact.gov
board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20

The licensure map: 49 states, DC, and BC

The path

Counselling is unregulated in BC until Nov 29, 2027, when psychotherapy becomes a regulated profession under CHCPBC. The market credential meanwhile is BCACC's RCC — and the MAP degree maps cleanly onto its six required course areas (none of the usual gap areas are required).

When it opens

RCC now, at any license stage: it keys to the degree and supervision record, not the license (registration finalizes once residing in Canada). Holding it before Nov 2027 is the best grandparenting position for the new college.

Exam

None.

Education

MAP coursework generally satisfies RCC's areas; 100 supervision hours including 25 directly observed is the item to verify from your records.

Where this law comes from

B.C. Reg. 131/2025 (Health and Care Professionals Regulation) followed the July 2024 designation of psychotherapy for regulation under the Health Professions and Occupations Act; per both CHCPBC's official page and the BC Ministry of Health's July 2026 Q&A, its psychotherapist provisions are not yet in force and take effect November 29, 2027, when CHCPBC becomes the regulator.

Before acting
  • Grandparenting into the 2027 college is expected but unannounced.
  • Immigration is its own project and nothing here addresses it.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — Ministry of Health Regulation of Psychotherapy Q&A (July 2026), CHCPBC Regulating Psychotherapy page, BCACC RCC eligibility page; B.C. Reg. 131/2025 itself remains JS-gated and is corroborated by the two official documents that cite it

RCC (voluntary) until regulation lands · B.C. Reg. 131/2025; BCACC RCC criteria
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: This entry moved four times in two days, each on evidence: opened contested (2026-08-19, the rule's non-education prong), reverted to closed (2026-08-20 morning, tiering standard), re-tiered to one year (same day, the specialist's transcript-only answer), and then strengthened again the same afternoon when the specialist answered the two remaining questions in one line: 'Yes, your associate-level practice will count toward the applicable practice requirement, and your master's degree in psychology satisfies the education requirement.' Everything Colorado had open is now corroborated in writing — informal and non-binding but on file. Moved to the open tier 2026-08-20: the unlock is written into the board's own application attestation and confirmed first-party three times — unlike Florida's secondhand favorable reading, which keeps that state at its statutory floor. Validation still needs a filed application, and the maintainer now qualifies to file one.
The path

Corroborated in writing, across three answers from the board's own licensing specialist: Colorado's endorsement route (the board's own rule, 4 CCR 737-1.12(C)(1)(b)) licenses an applicant who has held a current, unrestricted, substantially-similar-scope license for one year — and the board's license specialist confirmed the education review on that route is conferral-only: 'For the education requirement, you are only required to submit an official transcript verifying that a master's degree was awarded.' No equivalency worksheet, no credit count, no course list. The 60-hour floor and 6-credit cure cap that once closed this state live on the by-examination route and do not reach endorsement applicants. The specialist's third answer settled the remaining questions: associate-level practice counts toward the application's two-year practice attestation, and a psychology-titled degree passes on the transcript alone — moving Colorado into the open tier for anyone with a current license and two years of post-master's practice. The shared board inbox will not interpret rules; the licensing specialist answered all of it in writing.

When it opens

Open now, for anyone holding a current equivalent license who can attest to two years of post-master's psychotherapy practice — associate-level practice counts, per the specialist's written confirmation, so most of this cohort's licensed members qualify today. Documents: license verification, official transcript showing the degree was awarded, the attestations, and the jurisprudence exam. (The board rule's one-year-license prong remains the paper fallback if the practice reading ever fails.)

Exam

Board jurisprudence exam, mandatory for every endorsement applicant (4 CCR 737-1.12(D), via Prometric). National exam expressly required only on the education prong.

Education

Conferral-only on the endorsement route, per the specialist's written answer — the transcript proves a master's was awarded, and nothing in it is graded.

Where this law comes from

The portability program dates to HB 20-1326 (2020); the operative board rule version is effective 2025-09-14, and HB 26-1431 (2026) amends the framework for applications filed on or after 2026-08-12.

Before acting
  • One internal contradiction to carry into any filing: the licensing guide's 'all applicants' section says non-CACREP transcripts need a CCE education review, while the license specialist's written answer says endorsement applicants submit only a transcript proving the degree was awarded. The specialist's direct answer controls — keep it with the application in case an intake reviewer follows the brochure instead.
  • The specialist confirmed in writing (2026-08-20): associate-level practice counts toward the two-year practice attestation, and a psychology-titled master's satisfies the education requirement with the transcript alone. Keep all three of the specialist's emails with any application.
  • A staff answer is informal and non-binding; the jurisprudence exam is mandatory; and this route becomes validated only when a cohort application is adjudicated.
  • Get the license in hand before relocating — and note Colorado now also has a telehealth registration (see the remote-practice section) for serving Colorado clients from Washington without any of this.
Sources (mixed)

mixed: the endorsement rule and portability statute read in the sweep; the decisive practice question answered in writing by the board's license specialist 2026-08-20 (email retained by the maintainer)

  • CRS 12-20-202(3); CRS 12-245-604
  • 4 CCR 737-1, Rules 1.12 & 1.14 — https://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/GenerateRulePdf.do?ruleVersionId=9767&fileName=4+CCR+737-1 (verified 2026-08-19)
  • dpo.colorado.gov LPC pages (CCE equivalency notice)
  • C.R.S. § 12-20-202 — Licenses, certifications, and registrations; occupational credential portability program; exceptions; rules; definitions — https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_12-20-202 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • HB 26-1431, Colo. Sess. Laws 2026, ch. 407 — Competency for Occupational Licensure Portability (signed act text) — https://leg.colorado.gov/laws/session-laws/HB26-1431/407/download (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • HB26-1431 bill status page — Became Law; Governor signed 2026-06-04; effective 2026-08-12 — https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/HB26-1431 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • HB20-1326 bill status page — Create Occupational Credential Portability Program (Colo. Sess. Laws 2020, ch. 126, eff. 2020-06-25) — https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb20-1326 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • C.R.S. § 12-245-207 — Licensure by endorsement — https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_12-245-207 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • C.R.S. § 12-245-604 — Licensure; examination; licensed professional counselors — https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_12-245-604 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • C.R.S. § 12-245-607 — Interstate compact; powers and duties of the board — https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_12-245-607 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • C.R.S. § 24-60-4303 — Construction of terms (Counseling Compact; 'License' means a license issued pursuant to section 12-245-604) — https://colorado.public.law/statutes/crs_24-60-4303 (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • Colorado DPO Mental Health Boards, License Specialist (professional counselor) — written answer to a direct processing inquiry, 2026-08-20: endorsement method applies to an active equivalent out-of-state license; education requirement is an official transcript verifying a master's degree was awarded; LPC Applicant Checklist (rev. Feb 2025) attached. Informal staff answer, non-binding.
  • Colorado DPO, Professional Counselor Licensing Guide (rev. Feb 2025; provided by the board's license specialist 2026-08-20; read in full) — endorsement applicants attest to exam passage and to 2 years post-master's practice or 2 years active practice; the 'all applicants' CCE-review line conflicts with the specialist's answer and is flagged above.
  • Colorado DPO, Professional Counselor Applications page — 'you must hold a current, equivalent license in another state to apply for licensure by endorsement'; education equivalency reviews are now outsourced to CCE (relevant to the examination route) — https://dpo.colorado.gov/ProfessionalCounselor/ApplicationsDocs (verified 2026-08-20)
  • Colorado DPO, License Specialist — second written answer, 2026-08-20: 'your associate-level practice will count toward the applicable practice requirement, and your master's degree in psychology satisfies the education requirement.' Informal staff answer, non-binding.
LPC · C.R.S. §12-20-202(3); 4 CCR 737-1.12(C)(1)(b)
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing, 2026-08-21 (licensing specialist, Occupational Licenses Bureau) — and it removed the five-year premise this entry was tiered on: “There is not a time frame you have to be licensed in order to apply by endorsement. You just need to hold an active license in another state.” Bigger still: “Washington’s LMHC license is equivalent to the LCPC license in Idaho. If you met the requirements to become licensed as LMHC, then we know you met the requirements for LCPC licensure. You only need to submit all license numbers you hold or have held in other states as well as a copy of your photo ID.” Re-tiered +5 years → open 2026-08-21 on that answer. The answer contradicts the applications’ printed five-plus-years routing — favorably — so carry the email with any filing.
The path

The licensing bureau’s written answer (2026-08-21) redrew this entry: endorsement is open to any active out-of-state licensee — no time frame — and Washington’s LMHC is deemed equivalent to Idaho’s clinical LCPC, with the license verification standing in for the whole review: “If you met the requirements to become licensed as LMHC, then we know you met the requirements for LCPC licensure.” The stated document set is the license numbers you hold or have held plus a photo ID. The alternative exam route keeps the rule-book requirements (CACREP-or-substantially-similar program, NCE for the LPC tier, NCMHCE for the clinical tier, supervised-hours math), with the coursework addendum required only for non-CACREP degrees — that route, not endorsement, is where the coursework project would live.

When it opens

Open now, on the licensing bureau’s written word: an active license, the license numbers held in any state, and a photo ID. The five-plus-years language printed on the applications is routing text the bureau does not apply as a gate.

Exam

Endorsement: the bureau’s stated document set is exhaustive (“You only need to submit…”) and lists no exam element. Exam route (the alternative): NCE for the LPC tier, NCMHCE for the clinical LCPC tier, per the current rule text the specialist quoted.

Education

Endorsement: not reviewed — the equivalence determination stands in for it, per the written answer. Exam route: CACREP-or-substantially-similar program standard, with the coursework addendum only for non-CACREP degrees; the three-lists confusion documented earlier applies to that route only.

Where this law comes from

IDAPA 24.15.01 states it is promulgated pursuant to Idaho Code §§54-3402, 54-3404, 54-3405, 54-3405A, 54-3405B, 54-3405C, 54-3406, and 54-3410A, and every subsection in the current text carries a (7-1-24) effective-date stamp.

Before acting
  • The 2026-08-21 answer settles by practice what the repealed rule left open — but it also contradicts the five-plus-years routing printed on both applications, and the rewritten rule chapter still contains no endorsement standard. A single specialist’s answer is corroboration, not law: carry the email, and expect intake staff reading their own forms to need it.
  • Idaho publishes three incompatible content-area lists and three inconsistent fee schedules simultaneously; treat every Idaho number as unconfirmed until the board says it in writing.
  • Idaho is not a compact member — the license or the validated telehealth registration are the only doors, ever.
  • The universal-recognition statute (§67-9409) does not bypass any of this (it preserves ordinary qualifications).
Sources (Fable-graded with a provenance note)

Fable-graded with a provenance note: both license applications (with the mandatory five-plus-years endorsement routing printed on their faces) and the endorsement packet were read in full in the 2026-08-20 application-packet audit; the IDAPA chapter and Idaho Code remain sweep-verified. The unresolved substantive-standard question is the entry's own honest caveat.

LCPC by endorsement (WA LMHC deemed equivalent; telehealth registration covered separately) · Idaho Code §§54-5714, 54-3406; IDAPA 24.15.01
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
HYPOTHESIS: Re-tiered 2026-08-19 from closed: the universal-recognition sweep found the board actively operating the mandatory reciprocity statute. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether the NCE can satisfy the reciprocity statute's substantially-equivalent-exam clause.]
The path

Indiana's education wall (the non-curable practicum in 839 IAC 1-5-1) lives entirely on the licensure-by-examination route. A separate statute, IC 25-23.6-8.5-9.5, orders the board to issue an LMHC license within 30 days of a complete application to anyone holding a valid out-of-state license who passed a substantially equivalent exam — no transcript, no coursework review, no practicum question, no residency, no minimum years. The licensing agency implements it openly: its site carries a dedicated LMHC Reciprocity section, and the checklist asks for license verification and an exam score, nothing about education.

When it opens

Now — if your exam is the NCMHCE. The board reads 'substantially equivalent examination' to mean the NCMHCE specifically and rejects the NCE by name, so NCE-only licensees stay out until they sit the NCMHCE (or the compact arrives).

Exam

NCMHCE required on this route; the NCE is expressly not accepted. This is the sharpest example of the exam problem: Indiana takes only the exam that Pennsylvania's list omits.

Education

Not reviewed on the reciprocity route. The practicum bar that closed Indiana applies only to applicants qualifying by examination.

Where this law comes from

IC 25-23.6-8.5-9.5 has ordered issuance to out-of-state licensees since 2017; its current text dates to P.L.149-2022. The general health-care reciprocity chapter (IC 25-1-21, 2022) expressly carves mental health counselors out — the profession-specific statute is the operative one.

Before acting
  • The board is stricter than the statute: the law's exam test is functional ('substantially equivalent'), the checklist's is a named instrument (NCMHCE yes, NCE no). An NCE-holder could contest that reading, but plan around it.
  • No reciprocity rule exists in the administrative code — the route runs on statute plus the agency's checklist, so confirm current requirements before filing.
  • Indiana is live on the compact, so remote practice from Washington arrives by privilege once Washington goes live — relocation is what this route is for.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — the reciprocity statute set and both PLA checklists line-by-line 2026-08-19; the LMHC FAQ (NCE rejected by name) and 839 IAC 1-5-1 2026-08-20

LMHC · IC 25-23.6-8.5-9.5
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Endorsement (481—880.5(1)): application + fee + license verification is the entire review — the consolidated Chapter 880 rulemaking (ARC 9401C, effective August 13, 2025) implements 2024's HF 2515 and SF 2385 at the chapter level — the endorsement paragraph's bare application-plus-fee-plus-verification text is confirmed verbatim against the rule, though the rulemaking's own summary ties HF 2515 most concretely to the supervision rule rather than this one. Whether the leniency was the specific intent or a byproduct of consolidation, the text is the text; ask the board if you want certainty before filing.

When it opens

Now, with a full license.

Exam

Not reviewed.

Education

Not reviewed.

Where this law comes from

Iowa's endorsement rule 481—880.5 reached its current application-plus-fee-plus-verification form through ARC 9401C, the Board of Behavioral Health Professionals' adopted rulemaking published in the Iowa Administrative Bulletin on July 9, 2025 and effective August 13, 2025, which created a consolidated new Chapter 880 implementing 2024 Iowa Acts House File 2515 and Senate File 2385 (90th General Assembly, 2024 session).

Before acting
  • A background check may still occur under separate authority.
  • If endorsement is refused there's a licensure-by-verification fallback — but a verification license can never anchor compact privileges later.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 481 IAC ch. 880 complete, including the 880.5→880.2(1)(a) incorporation chain (application + fee only; fingerprints, transcripts, exams, and supervision attestation are not incorporated into endorsement)

LMHC · Iowa Admin. Code 481—880.5; ARC 9401C preamble
sources read 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board licensing staff replied to a cohort inquiry (2026-08-11; informal, non-binding): apply via the 'licensure by reciprocity' route (marriage.nv.gov), and one divergence from the statute's text: the board does not offer the provisional or temporary license that NRS 641A.242(5) authorizes. The 'corresponding license' question was answered only implicitly. Application runs through the Certemy platform.
The path

Expedited endorsement (NRS 641A.242): the board must issue to a holder of a corresponding unrestricted license — no education review, no exam, no experience review. A 2025 amendment (AB 450) made it mandatory and deleted the board's open-ended documentation catch-all.

When it opens

Now, as far as the statute's text goes; no years-licensed wait appears in it.

Exam

None on this path.

Education

None reviewed.

Where this law comes from

NRS 641A.242 took its current mandatory form through Assembly Bill 450 of the 2025 Nevada Legislature, enacted as Chapter 315, Statutes of Nevada 2025, effective October 1, 2025, which changed the Board's issuance duty from 'may' to 'shall' and struck both the applicant's burden to prove no prior investigation and the Board's open-ended 'any other information required by the Board' documentation clause.

Before acting
  • The corresponding-license determination happens in adjudication, not by email - the staff reply is an invitation to apply, not a ruling.
  • NO provisional or temporary license in practice, contra NRS 641A.242(5)'s text (staff statement 2026-08-11). Plan on full processing time with no bridge credential.
  • Confirm current fees and Certemy mechanics on the board's reciprocity page.
  • Mirror hazard: third-party code sites still print the pre-amendment 'may issue' text of NRS 641A.242 even though the mandatory version took effect October 1, 2025 — cite the enrolled bill or the official legislature page, not a mirror.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

CPC · NRS 641A.231, 641A.242; AB 450 (2025)
board asked 2026-08-07 · board answered 2026-08-11 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Every requirement re-verified live on the OPLC site 2026-08-07 by a cohort member preparing a filing (WA confirmed on the Plc 313.37 table; full packet costed at $325 + $48.25 + FBI card). Not yet filed, so not yet fully validated.
The path

Reciprocity under Plc 313.37: Washington is on OPLC's published qualifying-jurisdictions table for Clinical Mental Health Counselor. Reciprocity applicants submit NO transcripts and no exam scores — the 60-hour test was applied to Washington's standards, not to you.

When it opens

Now, with a full license — no minimum time holding it appears anywhere in the rule or on the table.

Exam

Not examined on the reciprocity track.

Education

Not examined.

Where this law comes from

New Hampshire's RSA 310:17 license-reciprocity provision was enacted by 2023 N.H. Laws ch. 111:1 (HB 594, 2023 session), effective August 27, 2023, per the source note printed on the statute's own General Court page — the statutory basis for the OPLC qualifying-jurisdictions table on which Washington appears.

Before acting
  • Verify Washington is still on the table the week you file — it's an agency-maintained list, not a statute.
  • Universal application + fee + license verification + FBI check is the whole packet.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

LCMHC · RSA 310:17; Plc 313.37; OPLC reciprocity page
board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing (counseling@cswb.ohio.gov, 2026-08-21), to both open questions at once: 'You do not need to hold an out of state license for one year to qualify for a license via reciprocity. The NCE will suffice for LPCC licensure requirements.' Re-tiered to open 2026-08-21 on that answer — the reciprocity rule read in full the same week contains no time floor, so the written answer and the rule text agree. Informal staff answer, non-binding; validation needs a filed application.
The path

Occupational-licensing reciprocity (ORC ch. 4796): licensed 1+ year in good standing with substantially similar scope — and Ohio dropped the NCMHCE requirement for the LPCC effective Jan 1, 2026, which invalidates every older guide.

When it opens

Open now, per the board's own written answer (2026-08-21): 'You do not need to hold an out of state license for one year to qualify for a license via reciprocity.' The one-year-plus-active-practice clock belongs to the ch. 4796 universal statute; the board processes counselor reciprocity under its own rule (OAC 4757-13-06), which sets no time floor.

Exam

Settled twice over: the 1/1/2026 policy change on the board's live instructions page, and now the board's written answer — 'The NCE will suffice for LPCC licensure requirements.'

Education

Light under reciprocity.

Where this law comes from

Ohio Revised Code chapter 4796 (universal occupational-license recognition) was enacted in its entirety by Senate Bill 131 of the 134th General Assembly, effective December 29, 2023 — every section's legislative history on codes.ohio.gov traces to that bill, and House Bill 442 of the 133rd General Assembly never touched the chapter — while the LPCC's separate NCMHCE requirement was eliminated effective January 1, 2026 per the CSWMFT Board's October 17, 2025 announcement.

Before acting
  • Confirm the 2026 exam change still stands when filing.
  • Ohio is live on the compact, which matters to the cohort only after the 90-quarter cure.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — ORC 4796.03, OAC 4757-13-06, and the live LPCC Application Instructions page (which verifies the 1/1/2026 NCMHCE drop; the 10/17/2025 news-release URL is dead).

LPCC · ORC ch. 4796; OAC 4757-13; board news 1/2026
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing, 2026-08-20 — nine minutes after the inquiry: endorsement is the route for current out-of-state license holders seeking full independent licensure, and 'an application for licensure by endorsement does not require a traditional academic review.' Document set, submission warnings, and transcript mechanics all specified. Informal staff answer, non-binding; validation needs a filed application. [Correction 2026-08-20, from a direct read of OAC 86:10-25 and the board's application page: the Oklahoma Legal and Ethical Responsibilities (jurisprudence) Examination is required for endorsement — the earlier no-exam reading missed rule 86:10-25-3(4) and the page's Step 4. No national exam; no tier change.]
The path

Endorsement: the board's own application guidance says endorsement applicants need no national-exam verification, and the rule sets no minimum time licensed.

When it opens

Open now with the full license in hand. Document set per the board: FBI and OSBI fingerprint background checks (two separate checks), official transcript direct from the university, board-to-board license verification (their form or Washington's equivalent), the fee via the online portal — and then the Oklahoma jurisprudence exam, which you register for after the complete application earns an exam eligibility letter.

Exam

No national exam for endorsement (Oklahoma never required the NCMHCE for anyone — its rules name only the NCE, confirmed by a full read of the rules text). But the state's own jurisprudence exam — the Oklahoma Legal and Ethical Responsibilities Examination — is mandatory for every endorsement applicant: OAC 86:10-25-3(4), and the board's application page spells out the sequence (complete application → exam eligibility letter → register).

Education

Corroborated in the board's own words: an endorsement application 'does not require a traditional academic review' — the degree is primary-source verified by an official transcript sent directly from the university, and nothing in it is graded.

Where this law comes from

The three-year mandatory endorsement provision at 59 O.S. §1906(E) was added by Laws 2019, c. 363, §62, effective November 1, 2019, and the companion Universal Licensing Recognition Act at 59 O.S. §4150.1 was added by Laws 2021, c. 342, §2, effective November 1, 2021, per each section's own amendment-history note (available only on the Justia mirror; no official Oklahoma copy would fetch).

Before acting
  • Two warnings straight from the board: do not submit a partial application (the Board will not review or accept it — gather all five items first), and fees are non-refundable once paid.
  • The jurisprudence exam is settled by direct read — OAC 86:10-25-3(4) and the board page's Step 4 both require it for endorsement — and no national exam appears anywhere in the endorsement requirements.
  • Transcript delivery is specific: electronically from the university bursar to the board's inbox (password-protected), or sealed by mail — not uploaded by you.
  • 59 O.S. §1906(E) — the statute's mandatory-endorsement provision — requires three years since initial full (post-provisional) licensure. The board's endorsement rule (86:10-25-3, 'shall issue') sets no time floor, and the board's guidance and written answer put no time condition on endorsement — but nobody has asked the under-three-years question directly. If licensed under three years, ask it before filing.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — OAC 86:10-25-1 to -25-3, 59 O.S. §1906 (2025, Justia mirror), and the board's application page; jurisprudence-exam correction folded the same day

LPC · OAC 86:10-25-3; 59 O.S. §1906
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: the endorsement document set, education-review scope, and how Washington supervision is documented.]
The path

Endorsement (Reg. 36-14): the regulation's text contains no education, exam, hours, or years-licensed test — licensure on the strength of the out-of-state license — and the board's own webpage endorsement section matches the regulation.

When it opens

Now, on the text.

Exam

Not required by the endorsement regulation.

Education

Not reviewed per the text.

Where this law comes from

South Carolina's endorsement regulation, S.C. Code Regs. 36-14, took its current lenient form through a State Register rulemaking filed as S.C. State Register Volume 46, Issue 5, Document No. 5075, effective May 27, 2022 — an administrative amendment rather than a numbered session-law act; the compact provisions in the same title (§§40-75-910 to 40-75-1050) were separately enacted by 2024 Act No. 189 (S.610), effective May 21, 2024.

Before acting
  • The regulation is genuinely this lenient, and the board's webpage endorsement section matches it. Do not confuse the 60-hour and exam requirements shown elsewhere on the same LLR page — those belong to the Associate (initial-licensure) pathway, not endorsement.
  • The board's levers are an undefined 'other documentation' clause and an equivalent-credential-level test; call to confirm scope before filing.
  • The statute's verb is 'may' (§40-75-260(B)(1)) even where the companion section reads unqualified — the board retains discretion; the bare rule being applied as written is exactly what the pending board query asks.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — Reg. 36-14 complete: license in good standing, no pending investigations, application + read-the-rules certification + fee, 'other documentation,' equivalent credential level; no education, exam, hours, or years test in the text

LPC · S.C. Code Regs. 36-14
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing (the board's program manager, 2026-08-21): supervised associate-credential time counts toward the endorsement rule's three continuous years, and the LPC and LPC-MH are 'two separate licenses' requiring separate applications. Re-tiered from +3 years to open 2026-08-21 on that answer: the cohort's 2023 associate starts already satisfy the clock. Informal staff answer, non-binding; validation needs a filed application.
The path

The no-transcript endorsement rule (ARSD 20:68:01:11) belongs to the plain LPC — real, at three years, with an NCE score verification. The LPC-MH, the tier that diagnoses and matches a WA LMHC's scope, runs through a different rule (ARSD 20:73:01:03) and the state's pages require the NCMHCE for it. So South Dakota at +3 buys the non-clinical credential; full scope equivalence is an NCMHCE question.

When it opens

Open now for most of this cohort, per the board's written answer (Program Manager, 2026-08-21): 'We can count your time under supervision towards the 3 years necessary for licensure by endorsement.' Three continuous years of licensure INCLUDING associate-credential time — which a mid-2023 LMHCA start satisfied by mid-2026. The endorsement still buys the plain LPC only.

Exam

LPC: NCE score verification (no retake). LPC-MH: NCMHCE.

Education

Not requested on the endorsement route.

Where this law comes from

Confirmed deliberate implementation of 2020's SL 2020, ch. 165 — SDCL 36-32-67 carries source note 'SL 2020, ch 165, §21' and SDCL 36-32-68 carries 'SL 2020, ch 165, §22' — with ARSD 20:68:01:11 promulgated as the implementing rule (Law Implemented: SDCL 36-32-67); no separate session law shaped the rule itself.

Before acting
  • Decide which credential you actually need before filing — the easy door leads to the lesser license.
  • Never apply on the in-state route: South Dakota won't backdate supervision.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: South Dakota's 2021 endorsement-mandate chapter (SDCL 36-1D) is a dead letter at this board — the endorsement form cites only the ordinary statute and imposes the three-year and exam requirements the mandate chapter never mentions.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — ARSD 20:68:01:11 complete: three continuous years, NCE score verification, active practice per SDCL 36-32-67, an eight-item document set with no transcript. The LPC-MH split (20:73:01:03) verified in the 8/19 sweep.

LPC by endorsement; LPC-MH (the diagnosing tier) is exam-gated · ARSD 20:68:01:11
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
HYPOTHESIS: Rule change caught 2026-08-19 during citation validation: 18VAC115-20-45 was amended effective 7/2/2026, one day after this guide's earlier verification date, removing the duration requirement entirely. The board's live endorsement instructions corroborate (no duration requirement shown). Nobody has tested the new rule yet — an application under it would be a high-value validation for the whole cohort. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether endorsement is processed under the amended rule (the old duration test deleted July 2026) and the education-review scope.]
The path

Virginia rewrote its endorsement rule effective July 2, 2026 (Virginia Register vol. 42, iss. 20) — and the amendment deleted the former 24-of-60-months practice test is gone. The current rule is a flat six-item list: application, fee, verification of every license you have ever held (with no unresolved board action), verification of a passing score on whatever exam your licensing state required, a current NPDB self-query, and an official transcript documenting completion of a graduate degree program — all prefaced by one gate: you must hold or have held an out-of-state professional counselor license that allows independent assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

When it opens

On the current text: as soon as you hold the full, independent WA LMHC. No duration-of-licensure or years-of-practice requirement appears anywhere in the amended rule. Treat this with care — the amendment is weeks old and untested. Confirm with the board before filing.

Exam

Whatever exam your licensing state required — the NCE satisfies it for Washington licensees.

Education

An official transcript documenting a completed graduate degree. The amended rule states no hour count and no content list; how the board actually reviews transcripts under the new text is unobserved.

Where this law comes from

18VAC115-20-45 took its current shape through a Virginia Board of Counseling regulatory amendment published at Virginia Register Volume 42, Issue 20, effective July 2, 2026, which replaced the previously subsection-structured endorsement rule (last amended at Volume 32, Issue 24, effective August 24, 2016) with a flat six-item list carrying no duration-of-licensure threshold.

Before acting
  • The amendment is six weeks old: expect board staff themselves to still be calibrating, and get any eligibility answer in writing.
  • Request your certified WA licensure file from DOH early; it remains the slowest document.
  • Associate-time questions are moot here now — the gate is holding the independent license, not years of practice.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the amended rule was read in full on 2026-08-19

LPC · 18VAC115-20-45 (as amended eff. 7/2/2026, Va. Reg. 42:20)
sources read 2026-08-19 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: universal-recognition procedure, residency documentation, and confirmation that no education review or exam applies.]
The path

Universal recognition (W.Va. Code §30-1-27, 2025): the state must issue the license, with no education review and no exam, but only once you establish West Virginia residence. Without residency, West Virginia's telehealth registration serves WV clients from anywhere; see the remote-practice section.

When it opens

Immediately upon moving there. The telehealth registration works without residency; see the remote-practice section.

Exam

No competency exam under universal recognition — though §30-1-27(d) permits the board to require a West Virginia law (jurisprudence) exam.

Education

Not re-reviewed by West Virginia — but §30-1-27(b)(4)-(5) inherits Washington's requirements rather than waiving them: the statute asks whether education, exam and experience standards existed in Washington and whether Washington verifies you met them. The sending state's file is the file.

Where this law comes from

W. Va. Code §30-1-27, the Universal Professional and Occupational Licensing Act of 2025, was enacted by Senate Bill 458 of the 2025 Regular Session, and §30-1-26 (interstate telehealth registration) was most recently amended by Senate Bill 299 of the same 2025 Regular Session, both per the bill-history records printed on the WV Legislature's official code pages; those pages do not display the bills' specific effective dates.

Before acting
  • The board's website may lag the 2025 statute — confirm implementation.
  • A universal-recognition license is WV-only and can't anchor compact privileges.
  • The 5-of-7-years endorsement alternative (no residency) lands around license + 5.
  • §30-1-27(a)(2) also unlocks without residency for a spouse of an active-duty military member accompanying them to a West Virginia station — a narrow alternative the residency framing above omits.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — §§30-1-27, 30-1-26, 30-31-8 complete; 27 CSR 1 remains unextractable (Word binary at the Secretary of State), so the board-rule layer is still unread

  • W. Va. Code §30-1-27 (Universal Professional and Occupational Licensing Act of 2025; license issued without examination to a person establishing WV residence, on an out-of-state license in good standing; enacted 2025 Regular Session SB 458 per the code page's bill-history record) — https://code.wvlegislature.gov/30-1-27/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • W. Va. Code §30-1-26 (interstate telehealth registration; most recently amended 2025 Regular Session SB 299 per the code page's bill-history record) — https://code.wvlegislature.gov/30-1-26/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • W. Va. Code §30-31-8 (requirements for license to practice counseling, incl. subsec. (b) recognition of a substantially equivalent out-of-state license) — https://code.wvlegislature.gov/30-31-8/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • 27 CSR 1, WV Board of Examiners in Counseling legislative rule, §§5.2-5.3, 6.1 — document confirmed live at the Secretary of State's site but served as a Word/PDF binary that did not extract, so the cited subsections were not independently re-read (no fetchable machine-readable official copy located 2026-08-19) — https://apps.sos.wv.gov/adlaw/csr/readfile.aspx?DocId=56956&Format=WORD
  • WVBEC, 'Becoming a Licensed Counselor' (confirms the endorsement path for applicants fully licensed at the highest level in another jurisdiction) — https://wvbec.org/becoming-a-licensed-counselor/ (verified 2026-08-19)
LPC · W.Va. Code §§30-1-26, 30-1-27, 30-31-8
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board credentialing specialist, in writing, 2026-08-20 (with the board's standard no-legal-advice disclaimer): the one-year clock runs on the same-practice-level license only ('We do not combine licenses'); universal recognition differs from endorsement only in requiring Arizona residency; and the endorsement pathway 'does not look at the program or hours' — regional accreditation of the university is the whole education test. The associate-clock question this entry carried is closed: answered no. Informal staff answer, non-binding; validation needs a filed application.
The path

Two doors at one year: endorsement (§32-3274, no residency required — but the degree must be a master's 'in the applicable field,' and a psychology-titled MA needs pre-clearing) or universal recognition (§32-4302, which the state must grant, with no degree review at all, but which requires Arizona residency). Arizona also has a telehealth registration, covered in the remote-practice section.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year, now confirmed: the board's credentialing specialist answered in writing that licenses are not combined to meet the one-year requirement — the license must be at the same practice level, so associate time does not count. Universal recognition (§ 32-4302) works identically with one addition: Arizona residency.

Exam

NCE qualifies everywhere in the scheme; no jurisprudence exam, just an online statutes tutorial.

Education

Corroborated in the board's own words: 'The endorsement pathway does not look at the program or hours, however the university must be regionally accredited.' Official transcripts are submitted, but only the degree and the institution's accreditation matter.

Where this law comes from

Arizona's universal-recognition statute, A.R.S. §32-4302, was enacted by House Bill 2569 of the 2019 regular session, signed April 10, 2019 and effective August 27, 2019, per the Board of Behavioral Health Examiners' own universal-recognition page; the enacting bill and year for the separate §32-3274 endorsement pathway were not determined this pass.

Before acting
  • The specialist's answers carry the board's standard disclaimer (staff may not interpret statute) — treat them as corroboration, keep the email, and expect the same-practice-level reading at intake.
  • Ask the board whether a psychology MA passes 'applicable field' before filing endorsement — or moot it with residency-based universal recognition.
  • Compact-live state, but that's irrelevant to this cohort until the 90-quarter cure and WA's go-live.
  • A §32-4302 universal-recognition license is valid only in Arizona and expressly not compact-eligible (subsection (F)); the endorsement route carries no such limit. (The statute also has a military-spouse door that skips the residency requirement.)
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — A.R.S. §§32-3274 and 32-4302 (Justia mirrors; azleg.gov JS-gated), and the credentialing specialist's three inline answers re-read verbatim in Gmail the same day. §32-3275 and the A.A.C. rules remain unfetched.

  • A.R.S. §32-4302 (universal licensure recognition) — https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/title-32/section-32-4302/ (verified 2026-08-19; azleg.gov was tested directly and is JavaScript-gated, returning no text, so the mirror was used)
  • A.R.S. §32-3274 (licensure by endorsement, incl. the master's-in-the-applicable-field requirement) — https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/title-32/section-32-3274/ (verified 2026-08-19; azleg.gov JavaScript-gated)
  • A.R.S. §32-3275 (endorsement basic requirements) — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19)
  • A.R.S. §32-3271(A)(2) (90-day nonresident exemption) — https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/title-32/section-32-3271/ (verified 2026-08-19; azleg.gov JavaScript-gated)
  • A.R.S. §36-3606 (out-of-state telehealth registration) — https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/title-36/section-36-3606/ (verified 2026-08-19; azleg.gov JavaScript-gated)
  • A.A.C. R4-6-304, R4-6-215, R4-6-501/502/505 (Supp. 25-3, incl. the 11/2/2025 rulemaking) — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19)
  • AZ Board of Behavioral Health Examiners, Universal Recognition page — https://bbhe.az.gov/universal-recognition (verified 2026-08-19)
  • bbhe.az.gov licensed-in-another-state and telepractice pages — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19)
  • counselingcompact.gov fees and jurisprudence tables (AZ live 9/30/2025; $250 + $30) — https://counselingcompact.gov/compact-fees-and-jurisprudence-exam/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners, Credentialing Specialist — written answers to a direct inquiry, 2026-08-20: one-year clock is same-practice-level license only (no combining); universal recognition adds only residency; endorsement does not review program or hours (regional accreditation suffices). Informal staff answer, non-binding.
LPC · A.R.S. §§32-3274, 32-4302, 36-3606
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Re-tiered 2026-08-19 from coursework-cure to a conditional one-year hypothesis on the strength of the statute's text; the board's non-implementation is flagged, not hidden. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether the BSRB processes K.S.A. 48-3406 applications, plus the degree-title reconciliation in writing.]
The path

Kansas has a genuinely Mississippi-shaped statute that nobody has wired up. K.S.A. 48-3406 — expanded in 2021 from a military provision to cover anyone who has established or intends to establish Kansas residency — says that notwithstanding any other law, the licensing body shall issue a license to an applicant who has held a similar-scope out-of-state license and worked a year in the occupation. No transcript clause, no education equivalence, a 45-day decision clock, and the license issues probationary then converts. It names the Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board expressly. The problem: the BSRB has adopted no implementing regulation and publishes no application for the route, and its ordinary education rule accepts a degree in counseling 'or a related field' but requires the program itself to be identifiable as counselor training (K.A.R. 102-3-3a(b)(1), (f), (g)) — which is where a psychology-titled degree has to make its case. Statute and board practice point in opposite directions; the statute is supposed to win, but no one has made it.

When it opens

One year in practice + Kansas residency (intent to establish it suffices at filing) — once the BSRB confirms in writing that it processes 48-3406 applications. Without that confirmation, fall back to the cure math below.

Exam

The NCMHCE has a substitution: 15 graduate diagnosis credits, 3 years clinical practice, or a diagnostician's attestation — two of three suffice. Under 48-3406, no exam beyond a possible jurisprudence test keyed to Kansas-law differences.

Education

Not reviewed under 48-3406 as written. On the ordinary route, the 60-hour standard with the confirmed supplementation reading (coursework 'as a part of or in addition to' the degree).

Where this law comes from

K.S.A. 48-3406 began as a military expedited-licensure section and was extended to all residency-establishing applicants effective 2021, with further amendments through 2025. The BSRB's regulation index contains no implementing rule for it.

Before acting
  • Write to the BSRB citing K.S.A. 48-3406 before doing anything else — the board's silence (no rule, no form) is the whole risk. The statute obliges boards to adopt implementing rules; this one hasn't.
  • Residency or documented intent to establish it is required — this is a relocation path.
  • Get the degree-title reconciliation question answered in writing regardless, in case the universal route stalls and the cure route becomes the plan.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — K.S.A. 48-3406 and 48-3406a on 2026-08-19; K.A.R. 102-3-3a complete on 2026-08-20 (the 'as a part of or in addition to' supplementation text confirmed verbatim at (b)(2)).

LCPC · K.S.A. 48-3406; K.A.R. 102-3-3a
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing (Credentialing Department, LA LPC Board of Examiners, email of 2026-08-20): the five-year threshold 'has been removed and is now updated to 1-year'; the posted application's old language is being updated and should be submitted as normal; and — verbatim — 'If you have been licensed for at least 1-year in your home state, you will not be subjected to meet our educational requirements.' Materials: fingerprint/background check, license verification, and an official transcript (collected, not judged). The follow-up on associate time is also answered, same day and verbatim: ‘It is only applicable to a full license’ (Credentialing Department, email of 2026-08-20) — LMHCA time does not count toward the year. Staff answers remain informal and non-binding, but both are written, current, and first-party. [Inquiry status: closed — both questions answered in writing 2026-08-20.]
The path

Endorsement at one year: Act 253 of 2024 dropped the old five-year threshold, though the board's own downloadable forms still recite five years.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year, on the full license only — the board confirmed in writing (2026-08-20) that associate time does not count. The posted form’s five-year language is stale; submit it as normal.

Exam

NCE accepted.

Education

Light under endorsement.

Where this law comes from

Louisiana's one-year endorsement threshold traces to Act 253 of the 2024 Regular Session (SB 60, Sen. Pressly — the 'Welcome Home Act,' enacted as La. R.S. 37:51-59), which set a statewide one-year universal recognition floor and which the LPC Board's September 20, 2024 Notice of Intent for LAC 46:LX-1101 and 3701 expressly states it amended its rule 'to align with'; Act 457 of the same 2024 Regular Session is a separate act that amended the distinct education-and-hours statute La. R.S. 37:1107.

Before acting
  • The forms-versus-rule conflict is resolved: the board confirmed in writing (2026-08-20) that the one-year rule governs and the posted form should be used as-is while its language is updated.
  • Direct-hours check: Louisiana wants 1,900 direct client hours — more than WA's 1,200 minimum, so your logged total matters.
  • The endorsement rule requires documentation of at least 40 continuing-education hours within the two years before applying (LAC 46:LX-1101(A)) — a requirement the board's emailed materials list omitted. Washington's biennial minimum is 36 hours, so count your CE before filing; four hours short is a real way to stall an otherwise clean application.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — LAC 46:LX-1101 (current through the June 2025 Register: one-year rule, NCE/NCMHCE/oral exam, 40-CEH documentation) and both board answers re-read verbatim in Gmail. R.S. 37:1107 and the Act 253 text by Opus agent as cited.

LPC · LAC 46:LX-1101; Act 253 (2024)
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: The decisive statute was re-read in full 2026-08-19: education under §73-50-2(3)(b) is verified by the sending state against the sending state's requirements — Mississippi conducts no education review on this path.
The path

Universal recognition at one year — requires establishing Mississippi residency.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year, upon residency.

Exam

No national re-examination — but the Mississippi Pass/Fail Jurisprudence Examination is required of every applicant: open-book (state rules + ACA code), 35 questions, 80% to pass, taken through CCE after the application is submitted and paid.

Education

Not reviewed under universal recognition.

Where this law comes from

Miss. Code Ann. §73-50-2, the Universal Recognition of Occupational Licenses Act, was added by Laws 2021, House Bill 1263, effective July 1, 2021, per the statute's own credits line in the official code text hosted by the licensing board and echoed on the board's LPC by Universal page.

Before acting
  • The statute contains its own poison pill: a license issued this way is valid only in Mississippi and expressly does not make you compact-eligible.
  • The board collects a copy of your original licensure file — supervision verification forms, transcript, national exam scores — from the sending state (or from you directly if the state won't forward it). Collected for the record, not re-judged.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — §73-50-2 on 2026-08-19; the board's LPC-by-Universal page (document set, residency proof, jurisprudence exam) on 2026-08-20. Part 2201 rules by Opus agent as cited.

LPC · Miss. Code §73-50-2
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Universal recognition at one year — and Missouri is unusually kind to this exact cohort: the career-development course is excused by statute for out-of-state licensees (RSMo 337.510.2(1)), and a 48-semester/72-quarter degree is grandfathered for anyone who enrolled before Aug 28, 2023 — which is every MAP grad in these classes.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year.

Exam

NCE accepted; no national re-examination under reciprocity. But every Missouri licensee takes the state's written, open-book examination on Missouri law (RSMo 337.510.4) — plan on it.

Education

Grandfathered at 72 quarter for this cohort; keep enrollment-date documentation handy.

Where this law comes from

RSMo 337.510's current version — including the §337.510.2(1) career-development exemption for prior and out-of-state licensees — took effect August 28, 2023 as enacted by 2023 House Bills 115 and 99, merged with Senate Bill 70 and Senate Bill 157; the 48-semester/72-quarter-hour grandfather for applicants enrolled before that date sits in the implementing rule 20 CSR 2095-2.010(1)(B), and the separate general universal-recognition statute RSMo 324.009 traces to 2018 Senate Bill 840.

Before acting
  • The grandfather keys to either date: a degree obtained before Aug 28, 2023 qualifies on its own (20 CSR 2095-2.010(1)(B) — 'obtained a master's degree or was enrolled'), so a June 2023 conferral on the transcript is sufficient documentation. Enrollment-date proof is a backup, not a requirement.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — RSMo 337.510 complete (career exemption at .2(1), one-year reciprocity at .3, open-book law exam at .4) and the full 20 CSR 2095-2 chapter (grandfather at 2.010(1)(B), NCE at 2.030).

LPC · RSMo 337.510; 20 CSR 2095
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Re-tiered 2026-08-19 from closed: LB 16 (2024) postdates the analysis that closed Nebraska, and its text — read in full — overrides the supervision-reconstruction bar. Untested; compact-exception question open. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether the department accepts §84-950 applications, the compact-exception clause, and the LIMHP practice-level mapping.]
The path

Nebraska's universal-recognition statute (Neb. Rev. Stat. §84-950, enacted 2024) orders any occupational board to issue a license at the same practice level to anyone who has held a similar-scope credential for one year, where the sending state required education, training, or exams — no Nebraska education review, no supervision reconstruction, and no residency requirement anywhere in the section. That last part matters: the supervision-ratio wall that closed Nebraska's independent (diagnosing) tier sits in the ordinary reciprocity rules this statute overrides. Nobody appears to have tested it: the health department still publishes only its old five-year reciprocity application, so the first mover will be invoking the statute in writing rather than filling in a form.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year on the statute's own terms — but expect to cite §84-950 to a department that has not built the application for it.

Exam

No new national exam; a jurisprudence exam only if Nebraska requires one of its own applicants.

Education

Not reviewed under §84-950 — the statute asks whether Washington imposed standards and whether you met them, which Washington verifies.

Where this law comes from

§84-950 was added by LB 16 §11, Laws 2024 (effective 2024-07-19), extending Nebraska's Occupational Board Reform Act framework into a mandatory universal-recognition rule. The department's published forms have not caught up with it.

Before acting
  • The statute's opening clause excepts occupations 'as otherwise provided in … an occupational licensing compact,' and Nebraska is a Counseling Compact member — whether that clause switches the route off for counselors is unresolved and is the first question to put to the department in writing.
  • The usual poison pill applies: a §84-950 license is valid only in Nebraska and expressly not compact-eligible.
  • The 'same practice level' determination decides whether you get the independent LIMHP or the non-diagnosing LMHP — argue from the WA LMHC's independent diagnostic scope.
  • Statute verified in full; department practice unverified — treat as untested until someone files.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — §84-950 with its companion sections and the 5-year reciprocity application on 2026-08-19; 172 NAC 94-006 on 2026-08-20 (the ordinary-reciprocity wall the statute overrides, confirmed: under-5-years applicants must document the full ordinary requirements).

LIMHP / LMHP · Neb. Rev. Stat. §84-950
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: the ledger's standing question: will the division demand the NCMHCE of an NCE-based endorsement applicant?.]
The path

Universal recognition (§58-1-302(2)): the division must license an out-of-state licensee with similar scope and one year of practice under the license — no education or exam conditions in the statute's text.

When it opens

Full license date + 1 year.

Exam

The one warning: Utah's own CMHC rule wants both the NCMHCE and the NCE, and a rule preserves discretion to demand exams from endorsement applicants. Whether they exercise it is the state's one open question; a non-passing-score alternative pathway also exists.

Education

None on the statute's face.

Where this law comes from

Utah Code §58-1-302(2)'s one-year out-of-state license recognition provision took its current form through Chapter 104 of the 2024 Utah General Session, effective May 1, 2024.

Before acting
  • Ask DOPL for written policy on the exam discretion before applying.
  • No temporary license, no telehealth registration.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — §58-1-302 complete (incl. the (8)(a) clause giving it priority over conflicting endorsement provisions) and R156-60c-302b (both NBCC exams). R156-1-302 remains unfetchable.

  • Utah Code §58-1-302 (license by endorsement; one-year out-of-state recognition at subsec. (2); eff. 5/1/2024, amended ch. 104, 2024 General Session) — https://law.justia.com/codes/utah/title-58/chapter-1/part-3/section-302/ (verified 2026-08-19; le.utah.gov and adminrules.utah.gov were tested directly and returned no extractable text)
  • Utah Code §58-60-405 (qualifications for licensure, incl. (1)(g)(ii) non-passing-score alternative pathway; eff. 5/7/2025, amended ch. 443, 2025 General Session) — https://law.justia.com/codes/utah/title-58/chapter-60/part-4/section-405/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • Utah Admin. Code R156-60c-302b (examination requirements: requires BOTH the NCMHCE and the NCE under §58-60-405(1)(f); amended eff. 1/25/2024) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/utah/Utah-Admin-Code-R156-60c-302b (verified 2026-08-19; adminrules.utah.gov returned no extractable text)
  • Utah Admin. Code R156-1-302 (eff. 4/23/2024), preserving discretion to require examinations of endorsement applicants — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19)
  • Utah DOPL CMHC FAQ and endorsement guide — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19)
CMHC · Utah Code §58-1-302; R156-60c; R156-1-302(4)
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: Path A confirmations: conferral-and-accreditation-only education test, clinical-exam waiver, and the two-year full-license clock.]
The path

Licensure by credential (BPC §4999.60): for anyone licensed 2+ years, the degree requirement is just 'a master's from an accredited institution' — no unit count, no content review — and the clinical exam is expressly waived. The cleanest big-state door the cohort has.

When it opens

Full license date + 2 years — and the license must be unrestricted the entire two years immediately preceding. Keep the WA record spotless.

Exam

California Law & Ethics exam only; NCE/NCMHCE irrelevant.

Education

None reviewed beyond the accredited master's. About 40 hours of California-specific short courses (law/ethics, CA cultures, child abuse, suicide) complete the file.

Where this law comes from

BPC §4999.60's licensed-two-years out-of-state structure — the two-year unrestricted-license threshold, the master's-or-doctoral-degree-only education requirement, and the waived clinical examination — was created by SB 679, chapter 380, Statutes of 2019, effective January 1, 2020, per the Board of Behavioral Sciences' own implementation guide; leginfo's 'Amended by Stats.' history note could not be read directly because the section page is JavaScript-rendered and returns no text to any fetch.

Before acting
  • Applying before the 2-year mark is pointless — the under-2-years path reviews units and is structurally closed to a 72-quarter psychology degree.
  • Any license restriction resets the clock.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

LPCC · BPC §4999.60
board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
FILED · PENDING: A cohort application (MOBILE endorsement) was filed 2026-08-03 and is pending. The associate-practice question will be answered by the adjudication itself; AAMFT's May 2026 report of the board staff's favorable reading stands as corroboration.
The path

MOBILE Act endorsement (§456.0145): reviews no education at all — no transcript, no CACREP, no course list. Needs an active unencumbered license, a national exam (the board expressly exempts NCE-holders from the NCMHCE), a clean record, and 2 of the last 4 years in active practice.

When it opens

Conservatively, two years of practice after full licensure. Possibly much sooner: the statute counts 'active practice' rather than license age, AAMFT reported (May 2026) that board staff read the amended act to include intern and associate-level experience, and a cohort application filed August 2026 is testing exactly that. If it approves, Florida becomes an open state for anyone with two years of combined practice.

Exam

NCE or NCMHCE; either one works.

Education

None reviewed. (The exam path closed permanently to non-CACREP degrees on 7/1/2025 — endorsement is the only Florida door, and it is wide open.)

Where this law comes from

Florida's MOBILE Act endorsement pathway at Fla. Stat. §456.0145 was created by ch. 2024-274, Laws of Florida (2024), and amended into its current two-years-of-active-practice-within-the-preceding-four-years form by ch. 2025-6 and ch. 2025-114, Laws of Florida (2025), with the 2025 changes effective July 1, 2025.

Before acting
  • Use form DH-MQA-5101; the older 3-of-5-years form still floating on their site is superseded.
  • The board's published email address rejected messages in our testing (July 2026); call (850) 245-4292 instead.
  • Florida also runs an out-of-state telehealth registration; see the remote-practice section.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

LMHC · Fla. Stat. §§456.0145, 491.006; Rule 64B4-3.0031
board asked 2026-08-03 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Two-year deemed equivalency (22 TAC §681.82(c)): after 2 years holding a full US counselor license, you are deemed to meet all academic and experience requirements with 48 graduate semester hours (exactly what MAP grants), 3,000 supervised hours, and 300 documented practicum clock hours.

When it opens

Full license date + 2 years.

Exam

NCE or NCMHCE via NBCC transfer; Texas jurisprudence exam within 6 months of applying.

Education

72 quarter = 48 semester suffices under this rule — the 60-hour standard never applies to you.

Where this law comes from

22 TAC §681.82 was originally adopted effective September 1, 2003 (28 TexReg 4134), and its current text — including the subsection (c) two-year deemed-equivalency language relied on here — reflects the amendment effective November 21, 2021, published at Texas Register Volume 46, Number 46 (November 12, 2021), 46 TexReg 7786.

Before acting
  • The work is documentation: your supervised-hours log and program practicum clock hours (SU's internship assessment forms recorded total hours — request yours from the program while records are warm).
  • Read this as an audit, not an automatic deeming: the board's own applicant page reasserts the full statutory eligibility requirements, there is no separate endorsement form, and the 48-semester-hour element leaves this degree zero margin — the practicum must appear on the transcript (the MAP internship does). Both the national exam element and the Texas jurisprudence exam stand on every path.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

  • 22 TAC §681.82 (academic requirements) — subsection (c) verified verbatim: an applicant holding a full active LPC in good standing from a US jurisdiction for at least two years immediately preceding receipt of the application is deemed to have met all academic and experience requirements, including the practicum, on 3,000 hours of supervised experience, 48 semester hours of coursework, and 300 clock hours of supervised practicum — matches the entry's claim exactly — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/texas/22-Tex-Admin-Code-SS-681-82 (verified 2026-08-19; the official texreg.sos.state.tx.us viewer has migrated to a JavaScript portal that returned no section text)
  • 22 TAC §681.83 (academic course content, referenced by §681.82(b)) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/texas/22-Tex-Admin-Code-SS-681-83 (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19; not independently fetched this pass)
  • BHEC LPC Rulebook (Nov 2025) — (no fetchable official copy located 2026-08-19: bhec.texas.gov returned no extractable text and no specific rulebook PDF URL could be confirmed without guessing)
  • Tex. Occ. Code ch. 503 (Licensed Professional Counselor Act; §503.302 base qualifications: master's or doctoral degree, at least 48 semester hours, 300 clock-hour practicum, 3,000 supervised hours, licensing and jurisprudence exams) — https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.503.htm (verified 2026-08-19)
  • 22 TAC sec. 681.82 (Academic Requirements / endorsement deeming rule) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/texas/22-Tex-Admin-Code-SS-681-82 (verified 2026-08-19; secondary)
LPC · 22 TAC §§681.82(c), 681.83
board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Re-tiered 2026-08-20 by the application-packet pass: the endorsement clause this entry once hoped for is not operated anywhere in DPH's applicant materials, but the four-years-licensed route is — with DPH's own page promising no transcripts, no training verification, and no examination. Moved from the coursework tier to the dated tier on the strength of the department's published text. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether the Department operates its substantially-similar endorsement clause, and whether Washington has been evaluated.]
The path

The counseling statute has an endorsement clause (§20-195dd(c)), but DPH publishes no endorsement form and does not operate the substantially-similar clause in any applicant-facing material. What it operates instead is a four-years-licensed route, and DPH's own page says it plainly: 'you will not be required to provide transcripts, verification of any training or be required to complete an examination.' Four years holding the license, and Connecticut stops asking questions. Under four years, the coursework door: 60 semester hours certified by the school on a pure checkbox form — no per-area minimums, no syllabi — across eleven named areas, plus a 100-hour practicum requirement separate from the 600-hour internship, both taught by faculty licensed or certified as professional counselors.

When it opens

Full license date + 4 years on the no-questions route (this tier's label reads three-or-four; Connecticut is the four). Sooner only via the coursework door, whose checkbox form is friendlier than most but whose faculty-licensure and separate-practicum demands add real friction for this degree.

Exam

NCE accepted — the only New England state where the NCE alone suffices on the standard path.

Education

Not reviewed at four years licensed. On the coursework door: 60 semester / 90 quarter hours certified by checkbox across eleven areas as the form prints them — human growth and development; career counseling; social and cultural foundations; appraisals or tests and measurements; counseling theories and techniques; research and evaluation; group counseling; professional orientation; and the rest of the form's list — with no per-area credit minimums and no syllabi requested anywhere.

Where this law comes from

The chapter's history notes give §20-195dd as enacted by P.A. 97-311, S. 4 and last amended by P.A. 21-121, S. 18, effective July 6, 2021.

Before acting
  • There is no LPC endorsement form — verified against DPH's full page index 2026-08-20. Do not plan around the statutory endorsement clause; plan around the four-year route, which is written down.
  • The four-year route runs under the health-professions statute CGS §19a-14d, not the counseling chapter — and it carries its own fine print: DPH may still require an examination, may deny in the public's best interest, and requires a background check. The no-transcripts promise is DPH's own page; the statute keeps those levers.
  • One year of inactivity and your file is destroyed — a new application and fee to restart. And nothing may pass through your hands: every document goes to DPH directly from its source.
  • The coursework door's hidden frictions: a 100-hour practicum requirement separate from the internship, and both must have been taught by faculty licensed or certified as professional counselors — documentation MAP grads should not assume exists.
  • DPH's own pages currently print three contradictory fee figures — confirm the fee inside the application, not from any webpage (including this one).
  • §19a-14d(b), read in full, reserves discretion for the department to require 'all, or a portion of, any examination' of a four-year-route applicant — DPH's page promises no exams in practice, but the statute keeps the option; the NCE already passed would presumably satisfy it.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — CGS §19a-14d complete: shall-issue at four years' practice, chapter 383c in the covered list, the (b) exam-discretion clause, and the (d) best-interest denial reserve. The DPH page and forms read in the packet audit.

LPC · CGS §19a-14d; §20-195dd
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Rewritten 2026-08-19: the earlier three-year label understated the route's cleanliness (no equivalence test, no transcript) and missed that the attestation track takes five years while three requires the NCC. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: confirming the five-year-attestation / three-year-plus-NCC policy, the no-transcript practice, and exam acceptance (first inquiry bounced off a dead inbox; re-addressed).]
The path

Two endorsement clocks, both counselor-specific and neither containing an equivalence test (D.C. Code §3-1207.10(c)): five years licensed gets you in on a license verification plus a written attestation of your experience — the board takes no transcript on this track — and three years gets the same if you hold the NCC. No residency requirement, no jurisprudence exam, and your existing national exam counts (DCMR 17-6605.2 accepts any exam a US counseling board administered). Since most of the cohort sits one career course from the NCC, three years is the operative number. Separately, DC's graduate-tier LGPC sits at exactly 48 semester hours — available now as a supervised foothold.

When it opens

Full license date + 3 years with the NCC in hand; + 5 years without it.

Exam

Whatever you already passed — DCMR 17-6605.2 accepts an exam administered by any US jurisdiction's counseling board. No jurisprudence exam.

Education

Not collected on the endorsement tracks per the board's published policy. Even DC's ordinary education rule is unusually friendly: psychology is an enumerated acceptable subject, and content areas are reviewed by content, not course title (DCMR 17-6602.2).

Where this law comes from

The endorsement subsection took its current shape in the Health Occupations Revision General Amendment Act of 2024 (D.C. Law 25-191, effective 2024-07-19); DC joined the Counseling Compact separately (D.C. Law 25-238, 2024-12-17), which neither amends nor conditions this route.

Before acting
  • The endorsement path runs on statute plus a board policy PDF — no implementing regulation exists in DCMR ch. 17-66 — so the policy could change without notice-and-comment; confirm it stands before filing.
  • Career development remains DC's one clear content gap if you ever land in the ordinary education review.
  • No telehealth registration — DC clients need a DC credential.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — D.C. Code §3-1207.10 complete: both endorsement clocks verbatim ((c)(1) five years' independent clinical practice; (c)(2) three years + the NCC), no equivalence test in the text, and the verb is 'may.' The DCMR chapter and checklists read in the 8/19 sweep and upgrade.

LPC (LGPC available sooner) · D.C. Code §3-1207.10(c); DCMR 17-6605.2
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20; general-inbox reply 2026-08-21: “Coursework review questions aren’t answered here… Once you submit an application all of your questions will be answered by the coordinator.” The two open questions — whether associate-credential practice counts toward the three years, and quarter-credit pairing in the three preserved areas — resolve only inside an application.]
The path

The explicit sub-60-credit lane: a master's under 60 credits + 3 years licensed + 3,000 hours of clinical experience, with coursework proof required in only three areas — ethics, diagnosis/psychopathology, and psychotherapy — all standard MAP territory.

When it opens

Full license date + 3 years.

Exam

NCE accepted (aggregators claiming NCMHCE-only are wrong); plus a no-fail online Maryland law assessment.

Education

Three-topic review only; note each topic wants 3 semester or 5 quarter credits, so a 3-quarter-credit course may need pairing — check your transcript's credit weights.

Where this law comes from

The regulations formerly codified at COMAR 10.58.12 as 'Supervision Requirements' were repealed and new Regulations .01–.10, 'Licensed Clinical Professional Counselors — Requirements for Licensure' — including .06's out-of-state sub-60-credit lane — were adopted effective June 28, 2021 (48:13 Md. R. 508), under authority of Health Occupations Article §§17-101, 17-205, 17-301, 17-304, 17-307 and 17-509; the session law that last shaped §17-304 itself was not located.

Before acting
  • Don't bother curing to 60 for Maryland; the sub-60 lane is no slower.
  • Incomplete files close after 90 days.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — COMAR 10.58.12.06 complete: the sub-60 lane at E(1)(b) (under-60 master's + 3 years licensed + 3,000 hours), the three-topic floor at D (diagnosis/psychopathology, psychotherapy, ethics — 3 graduate semester credits each), the Maryland law examination at A(3)(b), and the B exam-waiver clause.

LCPC · Md. Health Occ. §17-304; COMAR 10.58.12.06
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-21
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing, 2026-08-21 (Board of Allied Mental Health staff): the three years run on the full independent license only — “You MUST be fully Independently licensed in another jurisdiction for 3 years and practicing full time for 3 years” — associate/LMHCA time does not count; and the credit gap is completable — “You must complete the coursework to meet the 60 credits.” The group-supervision-cap question drew a request to clarify; follow-up sent 2026-08-21. For an October 2025 full license the window opens October 2028.
The path

Massachusetts amended its counselor regulations effective July 31, 2026, and the exam exclusivity survived the rewrite in definitional form: 'Board Examination' is defined as the NCMHCE (262 CMR 2.02), and reciprocal-recognition applicants must show a passing score on it (2.03(3)(c)) plus a license in good standing for the three years preceding the application. One quirk still favors the cohort: Massachusetts counts 80 quarter hours as equal to 60 semester, so a 72-quarter degree is only 8 quarter credits short — the mildest total-hours gap anywhere.

When it opens

For NCMHCE-passers: genuinely reachable — full license plus three years in good standing, roughly 8 quarter credits, and an hours top-up. For NCE-only members: the exam is the wall, and it is a sit-the-test wall rather than a structural one.

Exam

NCMHCE only, by definition: the regulation defines 'Board Examination' as the NCMHCE, so no substitute exists. New in the 2026 amendment: initial-licensure applicants face a five-year score-validity limit (2.03(1)(d), (2)(d)) — but the reciprocity paragraph (2.03(3)) imposes no score expiry at all, which is more favorable for already-licensed applicants than the amended rules' reputation suggests.

Education

The 80-quarter standard (mildest gap on the map) with a ten-area education review — elective-dependent.

Where this law comes from

262 CMR 2.00 was rewritten by the Board of Registration of Allied Mental Health and Human Services Professions and published in Massachusetts Register #1579 effective 7/31/2026 — confirmed by the regulation's own page footer, '7/31/26 262 CMR - 5 (Mass. Register #1579, 07/31/2026),' and by the Board's 7/31/2026 notice that it 'issued revised regulations to clarify and broaden licensing requirements for the licensed mental health counselor (LMHC) license, allow teletherapy for licensing experience hours permanently, and create a new licensed supervised mental health counselor (LSMHC) license.'

Before acting
  • The regulation was amended effective 7/31/2026 (Mass. Register #1579) — the widely-quoted 'no other exam will be accepted' sentence no longer exists, and the old exam section (2.04) is gone; anything citing it is out of date.
  • Not a compact member — no privilege route ever.
  • The experience rules' group-hours cap can bite a WA log.
  • The 2026 rewrite also created a new associate-tier license (LSMHC) — irrelevant to full-license holders, useful context for anyone reading Massachusetts materials.
  • The staff answer glossed the three years as “practicing full time” — a part-time practice history may draw scrutiny; keep practice-volume evidence.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the amended regulation was read directly on 2026-08-19

LMHC · 262 CMR 2.02, 2.03(3) (as amended eff. 7/31/2026)
sources read 2026-08-19 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
CORROBORATED: Board staff answered a cohort inquiry in writing (August 2026; informal, non-binding staff guidance): the three years in (6)(g) run from full licensure - associate/LMHCA time does not count. The education substitution itself is binding rule text, read in the filed order.
The path

Reciprocity, now on binding rule text: amended OAR 833-030-0011(6)(g) (effective 2/9/2026) lets 3+ years of active licensure substitute for the entire education package — including the 60-semester/90-quarter total and every content area. Psychology is expressly a qualifying degree field. Experience is separately presumed met at 3 years.

When it opens

Full license date + 3 years. Board staff answered a cohort inquiry (August 2026; informal, non-binding) that the clock runs from full licensure - associate time does not count. At that mark, OAR 833-030-0011(6)(g) substitutes the licensure itself for the entire education package, including the 60-semester/90-quarter total and every content area.

Exam

NCE accepted (within 10 years); Oregon's law exam is open-book.

Education

Nothing to cure at the 3-year mark. Entering earlier requires the full 90-quarter package plus 1,900 documented direct hours.

Where this law comes from

Permanent Administrative Order BLPCT 1-2026, filed and effective 2/9/2026 (agency approved 2/6/2026; proposal notices filed 10/28/2025 and 11/21/2025 after ten public Education Committee sessions from Sept 2024 to Sept 2025), amended OAR 833-030-0011 and carried the reciprocity substitution forward — the notice redline shows old (f) renumbered to (g) with its cross-reference deliberately expanded from 'Sections (a) through (d)' to 'Sections (a) through (e)', confirming deliberate implementation, not a drafting accident.

Before acting
  • Expect staff to collect the course-by-course form anyway; the substitution is what makes it moot.
  • Don't confuse this education substitution with the separate experience-hours substitution.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: primary sources read and analyzed directly

LPC · OAR 833-030-0011(6)(g), Perm. Order BLPCT 1-2026
entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether §136a covers LCMHC applicants without education review, and whether associate time counts toward the three years.]
The path

Fast Track endorsement (3 V.S.A. §136a): licensure on not more than 3 years of good-standing practice regardless of whether the licensing state's requirements are similar — Vermont's standards-blind portability statute.

When it opens

Full license date + 3 years at most (the statute says 'not more than' three years — a ceiling the board could set lower). Validation warning: OPR's own instructions preserve education and exam review in ways the statute's text does not suggest; treat the everything-waived reading as unconfirmed and ask OPR directly.

Exam

The standard path demands both the NCE and the NCMHCE — another reason Fast Track is the only sensible door.

Education

Not reviewed under Fast Track (confirm scope with OPR — their instructions are ambiguous about whether it waives review or just paperwork).

Where this law comes from

Confirmed deliberate implementation: 3 V.S.A. §136a was added by Act 152 of 2020 (2019, No. 152 (Adj. Sess.), §4), effective April 1, 2021, and amended by 2021, No. 69, §18, effective June 8, 2021 — per the statute's own source note, not a drafting accident.

Before acting
  • OPR instructions (January 2026) require the three years to be independent practice — the associate-time question is answered no here.
  • Whether Fast Track waives the education review or only the paperwork is the state's deciding question; OPR's instructions lean toward review surviving.
  • A 90-day provisional license can bridge verification delays — but only once all other requirements are met.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: Vermont's fast track (3 V.S.A. §136a) is itself the real thing — it licenses 'regardless of whether that jurisdiction has licensing requirements substantially similar to those of this State,' with no residency and no new exam. Its only gate is the three years.
  • One more door in the statute itself: §136a(c) lets the OPR Director waive even the practice requirement where the waiver follows state policy and the public is protected — a discretionary softener worth knowing if the three-year clock is the only thing in the way.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 3 V.S.A. §136a complete: 'not more than three years... regardless of whether that jurisdiction has licensing requirements substantially similar,' the (b) escape valve, and the (c) Director waiver. OPR instructions read in the packet audit; the scope query remains pending.

LCMHC · 3 V.S.A. §136a; 26 V.S.A. §§3265–3275
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: The board’s published reciprocity list (internally dated 2024-03-15) names the WA LMHC as approved — and board staff confirmed it in writing 2026-08-21: “Yes that list is current.” The same answer settled the clock (time under the associate credential does not count toward the five years), the review scope (reciprocity still verifies the degree and graduate-credit count from an official transcript), and the remediation mechanics: a minimum of 48 graduate semester credits to license, then “the first 4 years to get up to a total of 60.” A 48-semester-hour degree licenses with a 12-credit obligation.
The path

The board publishes categorical determinations by state, and Washington is already adjudicated both ways: a WA LMHC licensed five or more years is approved for the clinical LPCC, and one licensed under five years is approved now for the LPC — Minnesota's non-clinical tier — so there is a Minnesota license available to the whole cohort today, with the clinical upgrade arriving on the five-year clock. The five-year track's statute (§148B.56 subd. 2) contains no education test at all; no residency is required; the licensure fee package runs about $432. Sub-60-credit degrees still owe the 12-credit post-licensure remediation within four years.

When it opens

LPC available now; LPCC at full license date + 5 years. About 12 credits are due within 4 years after licensure either way.

Exam

Handled by the list — no NCMHCE retake demanded of listed credentials.

Education

The 12-credit post-licensure remediation is unavoidable for this cohort.

Where this law comes from

The five-or-more-years reciprocity track at Minn. Stat. §148B.56 subd. 2 was created by Laws of Minnesota 2019, ch. 28, §1 (S.F. No. 955, expanding duty to warn and reciprocity for certain mental health professionals and social workers), signed May 17, 2019 — before that the section was a single undivided substantial-equivalency paragraph.

Before acting
  • The pre-approval list is internally dated March 2024; board staff confirmed it current in writing 2026-08-21 — re-verify only if filing much later.
  • The statute's verb is 'may,' not 'shall,' and the board still collects full graduate transcripts with the application — expect paperwork even where no education test applies.
  • The 12-credit post-licensure obligation (Minn. R. 2150.2520) is the carrying cost this cohort cannot avoid.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — Minn. Stat. 148B.56 complete: 'may' at both subdivisions, five years of active practice at subd. 2 with the board choosing LPC vs LPCC. The board's categorical reciprocity list (the operative instrument naming the WA LMHC) was read in the sweep; its currency is the pending query.

LPCC · Minn. Stat. §148B.56; BBHT reciprocity list
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
The path

New York requires the NCMHCE on every path ('no other examination is acceptable'), opens endorsement only after five years of licensed practice, and can still route a Washington applicant into its full 60-hour, twelve-area education review. On top of that, diagnosing on your own requires a separate 'diagnostic privilege,' which carries its own 60-semester-hour education requirement.

When it opens

Five years of qualifying experience within the ten years immediately preceding the application (a rolling window, not a simple license-birthday), at best, and the NCMHCE regardless — slow, but genuinely open: this is an exam-and-patience state, not a closed one.

Exam

NCMHCE only in practice — with a nuance validation surfaced: the statute itself says only 'an examination satisfactory to the board'; the no-other-exam exclusivity is NYSED's departmental position, stated on its license-requirements page. Departmental positions are policy, and policy can move — but plan on the NCMHCE.

Education

60 semester hours across twelve areas on the full review; NYSED's individual evaluation can prescribe make-up coursework at its discretion.

Where this law comes from

The diagnostic privilege at Educ. Law §8401-a (and the §8401(3)-(4) definitions of 'diagnosis' and 'assessment-based treatment plans' it turns on) was added by Chapter 230 of the Laws of 2022, which NYSED's Office of Counsel confirms took effect in stages — some provisions June 24, 2022, with the Department barred from issuing any privilege until June 24, 2024 — implemented by 8 NYCRR §79-9.6; no enacting amendment for the §79-9.7 endorsement rule itself was located.

Before acting
  • Only pursue if New York is the actual destination.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — NYSED's license-requirements page complete: endorsement at 5 years within the preceding 10, 'No other examination is acceptable' (NCMHCE), the twelve substantial-equivalence areas, the Forms 1/2/3/4E/4F endorsement set, and the comparable-jurisdiction fallback to full review. Subpart 79-9 verified in the 8/19 sweep (Fable's re-fetch saved but not machine-extractable).

LMHC · 8 NYCRR §79-9.7; Educ. Law §8401-a
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Written answer from a division licensing examiner, 2026-08-20: the board 'is operating as normal' (wind-down year; extension sought next session), and — the substantive one — the new rules 'allow for counting supervised experience from another state as long as the experience is documented on the new completion of supervision form... Supervision completed in another state will be accepted as long as it was post graduate and earned under a similar program.' Informal and non-binding, but first-party and specific; the filed rule text posts August 21, 2026 and should be read before relying on any detail. Application-packet pass 2026-08-20: the by-credentials packet (read in full) reviews no education and no supervision — the entry's coursework framing described the harder of Alaska's two doors.
The path

Two doors, and the packets could not be more different. Licensure by Credentials asks for no transcript, no coursework form, and no supervision verification — five items: the application, the fee, license verifications sent board-to-board from every jurisdiction you have ever held a counseling-family license in, criminal-justice reports (Alaska's plus your home state's), and a copy of Washington's own counseling statutes and rules. Its single gate is the equivalence question: it is for holders of a current equivalent license from a jurisdiction with substantially the same or higher licensing requirements. The by-examination door is the coursework project described under education below — and it carries a trap the credentials door lacks: an applicant not issued an initial license within three years of passing the exam must retake it. File by credentials if you can; the ~12-credit cure is the fallback, not the plan.

When it opens

By credentials: whenever the board deems Washington's requirements substantially the same or higher — an equivalence determination not yet tested from this cohort. By examination: the day the ~12 added semester credits are done. The August 21, 2026 rules accepting out-of-state supervision help the examination route; the credentials route never asks about supervision at all.

Exam

NCE or NCMHCE, your choice.

Education

On the credentials route: not reviewed — no transcript is filed. On the examination route: the 60-semester total with career development not required (8 of 10 areas suffice), roughly 12 added credits for this cohort, with the areas as the check sheet names them carried in the coursework forms.

Where this law comes from

The compilation is the Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing's 'Statutes and Regulations — Professional Counselors,' Rev. 07/01/2025; it notes AS 08.29.210 (supervisor certification) was repealed by secs. 24 and 26, ch. 44, SLA 2024, and ties the 'related field' definition in 12 AAC 62.990(b) to sec. 6, ch. 75, SLA 1998 as amended by sec. 7, ch. 49, SLA 1999.

Before acting
  • File by credentials, not by examination, if at all possible: the examination packet's exam-recency clause (initial license within three years of passing, or retake) is a trap for anyone who tested years ago, and the credentials packet reviews no education and no supervision.
  • The new supervision form has not posted: as of August 20, 2026 the board's forms page still says updated applications are coming, and the live supervision form still requires board pre-approval before supervision begins — the old wall stands on paper until the new forms land. Recheck after August 21.
  • Two twelve-month clocks: an application is abandoned when twelve months pass since the board last received correspondence, and the $200 application fee (of the $450 total) is non-refundable. Every applicant needs an Alaska name-based background check even if never a resident.
  • Board housekeeping, resolved but worth knowing: the board operates in its statutory wind-down year while seeking an extension next session.
  • Fees as printed on the 2025 revisions: $200 application + $250 initial license; two-year cycle expiring October 31 of odd years. Verify at filing.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — both application packets 2026-08-20 (packet pass); the examiner's written answer re-read verbatim in Gmail 2026-08-20; AS 08.29.120 verified on a dated mirror (text matches the July 2025 compilation, whose PDF fetched but did not extract cleanly). 12 AAC 62's new text posts 2026-08-21 — the waiting action item covers it.

  • AS 08.29.110, 08.29.120; 12 AAC 62.100-62.400 (esp. 62.110, 62.120(c)-(d), 62.130, 62.220(b), 62.400) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/5/pub/CounselorStatutes.pdf (verified 2026-08-19)
  • Board FAQ (60 credit hours + 3,000 hours; Alaska license for Alaska clients) — commerce.alaska.gov
  • Board homepage (HB 126 frozen per AO 358)
  • Alaska DCCED, Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing — 'Centralized Licensing Statutes', June 2026, rev. 6/23/2026 (complete AS 08.01, AS 08.02, AS 08.03 text, incl. AS 08.01.010(36), AS 08.01.062, .063, .064, and AS 08.03.010(c)(6) and AS 08.03.020) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/portals/5/pub/Centralized_Licensing_Stats.pdf (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • Alaska CBPL, Licensing Examiner (Board of Professional Counselors inbox) — written answer 2026-08-20: board operating normally in its wind-down year, extension sought; new 12 AAC 62 rules accept out-of-state post-graduate supervision via a forthcoming completion-of-supervision form. Informal staff answer, non-binding.
  • Professional Counselor License by Credentials Application (instructions + application + letter-of-explanation + credit-card form), form #08-4911 (rev. Rev. 05/14/2025 (appended forms: 08-4752 Rev. 06/03/2024; 08-4438 Rev. 11/21/2024)) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/5/pub/pco4911.pdf (application-packet pass 2026-08-20; read in-full)
  • Professional Counselor License by Examination Application (instructions + application + Education Coursework Check Sheet 08-4910a + Verification of Post-Doctoral/Post-Master's Experience 08-4910c), form #08-4910 (rev. Rev. 07/01/2025 (08-4910a Rev. 07/01/2025; 08-4910c Rev. 07/01/2025)) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/5/pub/pco4910.pdf (application-packet pass 2026-08-20; read in-full)
  • Board of Professional Counselors — Applications and Forms (board forms index; carries the Associate Counselor / Board-Approved Supervisor rules notice) (rev. no revision date printed; fetched 2026-08-20) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/cbpl/ProfessionalLicensing/ProfessionalCounselors/ApplicationsForms.aspx (application-packet pass 2026-08-20; read in-full)
  • Board-Approved Professional Counselor Supervisor application, form #08-4430 (linked, not fetched — superseded version pending the 8/21/2026 rules) (rev. Rev. 11/01/2024) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/Portals/5/pub/pco4430.pdf (application-packet pass 2026-08-20; read partial)
  • New 12 AAC 62 rules (Associate Counselor + Board-Approved Supervisor) and the new completion-of-supervision form (rev. NOT YET POSTED as of 2026-08-20) — https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/cbpl/ProfessionalLicensing/ProfessionalCounselors/ApplicationsForms.aspx (application-packet pass 2026-08-20; read unfetchable)
LPC · AS 08.29.120; 12 AAC 62
sources read 2026-08-21 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Application-packet pass 2026-08-20 (forms read in full): the twelve areas and the board's own 4:3 quarter conversion halve the credit gap; the three-year supervision buyout was found relocated, not deleted; and the board's go-live FAQ confirms compact membership active July 30, 2026.
The path

The coursework review is real and filed on every path — the Required Course Summary's first line makes you tick which: Traditional, Provisional, Act 457, Military, or LBE — so classes are always part of Arkansas. But two corrections shrink the project and one changes the state's meaning entirely. First, the conversion: Arkansas prints its own ratio — 3 semester = 4 quarter credits — so 72 quarter hours is 54 semester hours here, a six-hour gap, not twelve. Second, the old three-year threshold did not vanish; it moved: three years of unbroken Washington licensure lets the board approve your supervision hours on the license alone, skipping the hour-by-hour audit. Third, and the headline: Arkansas went live in the Counseling Compact on July 30, 2026 — the moment Washington goes live, Arkansas arrives by privilege ($50 + $30) without any of this.

When it opens

Whenever the coursework gap is closed — about six semester hours — plus, at three years of unbroken licensure, the supervision audit dissolves. Or wait for the compact: Arkansas is live, and a privilege beats all of it for remote practice.

Exam

NCE or NCMHCE, verified in the board's own rule.

Education

Sixty semester hours at a B- or better, twelve areas as the Required Course Summary prints them: professional identity and ethics (3); social and cultural diversity (3); human growth and development (3); career development (3); helping relations (3); group work (3); assessment (3); research and program evaluation (3); abnormal psychology/psychopathology (3); marriage, family and relationship systems (3); a supervised practicum/internship block of nine graduate credits across at least three courses over six-plus months — credit-denominated, the same species of bar Rhode Island's closure turns on, so check your transcript's field-experience credits, not just clock hours; and use of technology in counseling — one credit, not three. At Arkansas's own 4-quarter-to-3-semester conversion, this cohort's gap is about six semester hours plus any missing named areas. Non-CACREP applicants also file two graduate catalogs and a syllabus for every listed course.

Where this law comes from

The Automatic Occupational Licensure Act was Act 457 of 2023 (effective 2023-08-01, by constitutional default). The board implements it by posting the act itself and a rule (17 CAR §75-905) that grants the license and then requires all remaining requirements within one year on pain of revocation. The endorsement rule's three-year threshold was removed in the June–July 2026 revision.

Before acting
  • Arkansas became the compact's seventh live state on July 30, 2026 (the board's own go-live FAQ) — for remote practice, the privilege will make this whole entry moot once Washington joins.
  • Corrected 2026-08-20: the direct-hours figure is 2,000, not 2,200, and three years of unbroken Washington licensure substitutes for the hours audit entirely.
  • Syllabus archaeology applies here too: non-CACREP applicants submit two graduate catalogs plus a syllabus per listed course. Collect them now.
  • Twelve-month application clock with one paid extension; the universal-recognition (Act 457) route still requires Arkansas residency and defers rather than waives all of this.
  • A jurisprudence exam is required of endorsement applicants (runs through CCE Academy).
Sources (Fable)

Fable: application forms and the Act texts (457, 968, 725, 820) read in full 2026-08-19/20; the ABEC 2024 rules PDF is cited but was not independently re-read — the rule-text layer rides on the packet-pass forms, which recite the operative requirements.

LPC · Ark. Code Ann. §§17-7-101–106; 17 CAR §75-905
sources read 2026-08-19 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: This entry reversed twice on 2026-08-20 and the record should say so plainly: a packet-level review reported the NCC absent from the applicant materials and this guide withdrew its NCC advice; an adversarial re-check the same day found the board's own page stating NBCC certification 'is a requirement of licensure for all applicants' and the statute (§3034(a)) gating reciprocity on national certification. The original reading stands, restored. The five-year no-further-documentation clause is real and eases paperwork; it does not replace the certification.
The path

Delaware's reciprocity runs on national certification plus a similarity review, and the board's own description says NBCC certification is a requirement of licensure for all applicants (24 Del. C. §3034). The pieces fit together like this: hold the NCC (for most of this cohort, one career course away — see the NCC section), and reciprocity is available from a substantially-similar state; at five-plus years licensed in any one jurisdiction, the board's page adds that 'no further documentation is needed' — the similarity paperwork thins out, but the certification requirement stands. The examination route's CACREP-standards course mapping remains the door to avoid.

When it opens

After obtaining the NCC — the career course is the cure here — plus the similarity review of Washington's rules (which five-plus years licensed reduces to nearly nothing). A no on similarity routes to the associate license, not a denial.

Exam

NCE accepted by statute.

Education

Not reviewed on the NCC-based reciprocity route; the CACREP-standards mapping exists only on the examination route.

Where this law comes from

The section credits show §3032 last amended by 83 Del. Laws, c. 433, §20 and §3034 last amended by 81 Del. Laws, c. 425, §18.

Before acting
  • Two research passes read this state oppositely within one day — one found the NCC nowhere, a re-check found the board's page requiring NBCC certification of all applicants. The board's page and the statute win; if you want certainty beyond that, the question for the board is one line: does the reciprocity route require current NCC certification?
  • The DELPROS portal clock starts when you OPEN the application: six months to submit or it deletes. Gather documents first, open last.
  • Delaware's background check cannot be recycled from another state's licensure.
  • The telehealth registration's compact-state bar still stands (see the remote-practice section).
  • Statutory anatomy of the five-year clause, for precision: §3034(a) is the certification-plus-similar-state door and reads 'shall grant'; §3034(b) is the five-year door for jurisdictions whose standards are NOT substantially similar, and reads 'may be licensed.' The board's page glosses five years as 'no further documentation' — the statute makes that door discretionary.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 24 Del. C. §§3030–3034 complete and the board's live LPCMH page (modified 2026-07-08), which still carries 'certification… is a requirement of licensure for all applicants,' the five-year no-further-documentation clause, and the associate fallback.

LPCMH · 24 Del. C. §§3032–3034, 6003
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Application-packet pass 2026-08-20: the 80-quarter conversion (halving the gap), the degree-title discretionary risk, the strict lookback phrasing, and the portal-only filing all come from the board's own application revisions read in full.
The path

Course-by-course review against the 60-hour standard; a live statute-versus-rule conflict (the rule still contains a deleted 'applied psychology' pathway) makes outcomes less predictable than the paper suggests.

When it opens

The day the coursework is done — about eight quarter hours here — with no waiting period; but check the sixty-month lookback below before assuming your hours survive.

Exam

NCE accepted.

Education

The total is 'a minimum of 60 semester or 80 quarter hours' — Georgia converts at 80, not 90, so a 72-quarter transcript is eight quarter hours short, roughly half the cure elsewhere. The degree must be in clinical counseling or counseling psychology from a regionally accredited program — an M.A. in Psychology is neither name, a discretionary risk independent of credits. The eleven areas as the application prints them include counseling/psychotherapy theory and practicum, with career development required and addictions and sexuality not. No syllabi or catalog descriptions are demanded anywhere — course numbers and titles are read against the rule directly. The rule's own definition settles the supplementation question in this cohort's favor: the required courses may be completed 'either as part of the degree program or as additional course work completed prior to, during or after the degree program' (135-5-.02(a)11) — express post-degree supplementation. Note the rule itself prints no credit total at all: the 60-semester/80-quarter figure lives on the application and the 60/90 in the statute, making the rule a third instrument in the credit-total conflict.

Where this law comes from

O.C.G.A. §43-10A-11 was last amended by 2024 Ga. Laws 557, §2, effective July 1, 2024, following the 2022 Ga. Laws 813, §1 rewrite effective July 1, 2022.

Before acting
  • The credit total is itself in conflict between Georgia's own instruments: the current application prints '60 semester or 80 quarter hours' while the statute (O.C.G.A. §43-10A-11) prints 90 quarter. Eight hours short on the form's math, eighteen on the statute's — get the number in writing before enrolling, and use the higher number.
  • The sixty-month lookback is Georgia's real trap: experience and supervision 'should not be reported for more than a 5 year/60-month period immediately preceding the submission of the application' — cohort members whose supervised hours ended more than five years before filing lose them.
  • Georgia's own instructions conflict on filing channel too: the how-to guide says portal-only (paper returned to sender) while the 08-15-2023 application revision instructs mailing with a mail-processing fee. Confirm the channel with the board before submitting anything.
  • If any supervisor was an LPC, the current application demands their ACS or CPCS credential number — reconstruct that before filing.
  • Do not register for the background check before submitting the application; those fees don't come back.
  • Georgia is live on the compact, so after the 90-quarter cure and Washington's go-live it arrives by privilege without any of this.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — Ga. Comp. R. 135-5-.02 complete: the applied-psychology pathway (f) is live in the current compilation (statute-vs-rule conflict confirmed), the 'prior to, during or after' supplementation clause verified verbatim at (a)11, and the 60-month lookback with its endorsement case-by-case discretion at (a)7(vi)/(a)8(vi). Board application forms read in the packet audit.

LPC · O.C.G.A. 43-10A-11; Rule 135-5-.02
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Two-source corroboration, 2026-08-20: the program office answered in writing (courses may combine within an area; post-degree coursework fills short areas; the new provisional license is for hour-accruers with Hawaii supervisors, not out-of-state licensees), and the board's full application instructions were read the same day — the nine subject areas, per-area minimums, practicum and post-graduate specifications, and the complete-before-filing rule above all come from that document, not summaries.
The path

No reciprocity exists and license age never helps — but the totals are friendly: 48 semester hours is exactly Hawaii's number, and the statute expressly allows post-degree supplementation with no cap. It's a pure content-area project.

When it opens

The day the short areas are cured — no waiting period, no NCMHCE, no exam retake (NBCC sends your NCE verification). But everything must be complete before filing: education, practicum, and all 3,000 post-graduate hours — Hawaii accepts no in-progress applications, and an application not completed within a year is destroyed as abandoned.

Exam

NCE, by score verification; no retake.

Education

The full checklist, from the application instructions (read in full 2026-08-20): 48 semester / 72 quarter graduate hours — exactly what MAP grants — including all nine subject areas at a minimum of 3 semester / 5 quarter hours each: (a) human growth and development; (b) social and cultural foundations; (c) counseling theories and applications; (d) group theory and practice; (e) career and lifestyle development; (f) appraisal of human behavior; (g) tests and measurements; (h) research and program evaluation; (i) professional orientation and ethics. Note that appraisal and tests-and-measurements are separate areas — the less obvious gap, since most transcripts that cover one lean on it for both. Multiple courses may combine within an area (each course counted once, per the program office), and post-degree graduate coursework fills any short area. For most MAP transcripts the gaps are career and lifestyle development and tests and measurements.

Where this law comes from

The section's source note reads L 2004, c 209, pt of §2, as amended by L 2006, c 14, §3; L 2007, c 252, §2; L 2008, c 206, §1; L 2018, c 185, §2; and L 2020, c 63, §2.

Before acting
  • The paperwork is the main work: the Coursework Form needs a catalog description AND syllabus for every course listed — start collecting 2022–2024 syllabi now, while the program can still produce them. Practicum (2+ terms, 6 semester / 10 quarter hours, 300+ supervised contact hours) and post-graduate experience both need notarized supervisor verification forms.
  • A window trap in the experience rule: the 3,000 post-graduate hours with 100 hours of face-to-face supervision must be completed in no less than two and no more than four years. Cohort members who accrued hours slowly (part-time practice) can fail the four-year cap — check your own dates before anything else.
  • Supervisors must have been licensed (MHC, psychologist, clinical social worker, psychiatric APRN, psychiatrist, or MFT) for the entire supervised period — a WA LMHC supervisor qualifies on its face.
  • The program office's answers carry Hawaii's own disclaimer (HAR §16-201-90: informational, not binding on the Board). Keep the email with any application.
  • No reciprocity exists — the application instructions say so flatly — and license age never helps; nothing about waiting changes this entry. Fees: $60 application; license fees vary by triennium year ($256–$444 as printed in the mid-2024 revision — verify at filing); renewal is triennial every June 30.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — the board's application instructions 2026-08-20; HRS §453D-7 complete and the program office's three answers re-read verbatim in Gmail 2026-08-20 (the supplementation clause — 'includes, or is supplemented by' — is in the statute itself, uncapped; the 2-to-4-year experience window and the 300-hour practicum floor are statutory).

  • HRS §453D-7 — https://law.justia.com/codes/hawaii/title-25/chapter-453d/section-453d-7/ (verified 2026-08-19)
  • DCCA-PVL application instructions MHC-00 (0624R)
  • Act 93 (SLH 2024) associate license memo, eff. 7/1/2026
  • Hawai'i Mental Health Counselor Program (DCCA PVL) — written answers to a direct inquiry, 2026-08-20: course-combining within areas allowed; post-degree supplementation allowed; provisional license scoped to hour-accruers. Informational per HAR §16-201-90, not binding on the Board.
  • DCCA PVL, Requirements & Instructions — Mental Health Counselor License Application (rev. 06/24; read in full): nine subject areas at 3 semester / 5 quarter hours each within the 48/72 total; practicum 2 terms / 300 contact hours; post-graduate 3,000 hours + 100 supervision in 2–4 years; syllabi and catalog descriptions required per course; no reciprocity; complete-before-filing — https://cca.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Require-Instruct-App-for-Mental-Health-Counselor_06.24R.pdf (verified 2026-08-20)
LMHC · HRS §453D-7
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: Application-packet pass 2026-08-20: the 60-hour floor is live and application-date-keyed by the rule's own words; the university-sealed practicum certification and the undisclosed residence rule are the new findings; the LPC-first sequence and the NCC substitution are the strategies worth knowing.
The path

Illinois raised its degree minimum from 48 to 60 semester hours on July 1, 2026 — weeks ago — and whether the trigger is application date or graduation date is genuinely ambiguous in the rule. A graduation-date reading would nearly erase the education gate for this cohort; nobody has the answer yet.

When it opens

After the cure — now definitively against the 60-hour standard — and only if the university will certify the practicum box. The strategic sequence: Illinois's LPC tier requires no post-degree experience and only the NCE, and an active Illinois LPC then substitutes for the entire clinical tier's education file — cure once, at the LPC gate.

Exam

LPC: NCE. LCPC (the independent tier): both the NCE and the NCMHCE — one of the only states requiring both.

Education

Settled, unfavorably, by the rule's own text: 'Beginning July 1, 2026, individuals applying for licensure shall graduate from a program with a minimum of 60 semester hours or 90 quarter hours' — application date, no grandfather, so this cohort is 12 semester hours short today regardless of graduation year. Thirteen named areas at 3 semester hours each on the certification-of-education form, which the UNIVERSITY completes under seal — including a yes/no box certifying a 700-hour practicum with 280 direct hours, which a 600-hour internship fails. An undisclosed 30-semester-hour single-institution residence rule lives in the rule text and appears in no applicant document. Two favorable clauses the rule itself carries: post-degree coursework may make up deficiencies expressly, and only seven of the thirteen core areas must sit inside the degree.

Where this law comes from

The posted 225 ILCS 107 text carries P.A. 103-715, effective January 1, 2025, among its amendatory notes.

Before acting
  • The application-date question is settled by the rule text itself (July 1, 2026, 'individuals applying') — but both IDFPR qualification sheets still describe it in the future tense; expect confusion at intake and carry the rule cite.
  • The 700/280 practicum is a sealed university yes/no certification, not an hours negotiation — ask SU whether it would check that box before spending anything on Illinois.
  • The NCC substitutes for the education certification on the LPC tier expressly (§1375.30); whether it does the same at the clinical tier is unconfirmed — ask before relying. Either way, for this state the career-course-then-NCC route has real value.
  • Applications stay active three years; fees are non-refundable, printed twice.
Sources (Fable-graded with a provenance note)

Fable-graded with a provenance note: the full Part 1375 text and both IDFPR qualification snapshots were read in the 2026-08-20 application-packet audit, and the entry carries the §1375.45 July-2026 trigger quote verbatim; IDFPR and ILGA pages are JS-gated to direct re-fetch, so no independent Fable re-read exists yet.

LCPC / LPC · 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1375
sources read 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20; staff counter-question 2026-08-21: “How many years have you been licensed in Washington state as a full unrestricted Counselor? The answers to your questions will depend on what you provide.” Reply sent 2026-08-21 (full license October 2025; associate July 2023–October 2025); the three questions remain open.]
The path

Michigan grandfathers the 48-hour tier by program-entry date (on or before June 30, 2023) — which covers everyone in these classes. The remaining gap is typically one course wide (career development, if your electives lack it), and Michigan's endorsement rule reviews NO supervised experience at all. Separately — and now confirmed from the licensing agency's own guide (revision dated 2026-01-26) — Michigan's endorsement route stops reading transcripts entirely at five years: an applicant licensed five or more years in another state files only a Professional Disclosure Statement, with the education-and-examination presumption of R 338.1775(2) doing the rest. Under five years, the transcript and equivalency machinery reattaches. So Michigan is a cheap cure now or a paperwork state at license + 5, whichever arrives first for you.

When it opens

After the career course (if needed) plus the credential evaluation — still one of the cheapest cures on the map — or, at full license + 5, a one-document filing with education and exam both presumed.

Exam

NCE accepted.

Education

Two tiers that appear nowhere in the applicant packet — the licensing guide names no credit figure at all; the numbers live in rule: the 48-semester/72-quarter tier for program entry on or before June 30, 2023 (this whole cohort — 72 quarter meets it exactly, zero margin) and the 60/90 tier for later entrants. The only named-area list an applicant actually fills out is the evaluator's Michigan form (CCE or any NACES member — CCE is not mandated), and the areas it prints are diagnosis- and treatment-shaped. At five-plus years of full licensure, the education question disappears entirely: the rule presumes license verification, education, AND examination satisfied, and the endorsement document set is a single Professional Disclosure Statement.

Where this law comes from

R 338.1765 and R 338.1775 both carry the history '2021 AACS; 2023 AACS' — the 48-hour/60-hour split by program-entry date comes from the 2023 AACS rule set, and the January 15, 2026 final rules (2026 MR 2) amended R 338.1761, 1763, 1771, 1772 and 1781 but left R 338.1765 and R 338.1775 untouched.

Before acting
  • The grandfather turns on program ENTRY, not graduation — preserve admission-date evidence; the evaluator, not the guide, is where it matters.
  • The tiers are invisible in the applicant packet (the guide prints no numbers) — carry the rule citation, because intake staff reading their own guide can't see your grandfather.
  • The evaluator is a free choice: CCE or any current NACES member; CCE's Michigan form is itself stale (it prints only the 48/72 tier).
  • The five-year endorsement presumption waives more than transcripts — examination too; the document set is one disclosure statement.
  • The agency guide still cites CACREP 2009/2016 while the January 2026 rules adopted the 2024 standards — the vintage question remains with LARA (query in flight).
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — Mich. Admin. Code R 338.1765 complete: the entry-date grandfather verified verbatim ('entered a program on or before June 30, 2023' at 48/72), 'any supplemental coursework' expressly within the evaluation's scope, and the CCE-or-NACES evaluator choice in the rule text. MCL 333.16186 and the licensing guides read in the sweep and packet audit.

LPC · R 338.1765, R 338.1775
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-21
HYPOTHESIS: Corrected twice on 2026-08-20, in opposite directions, and both corrections are recorded: a packet-level pass read the supplementation allowance as limited to pre-2009 degrees and the weekly-intensity rule as voiding part-time practice; the adversarial re-check found route (b)'s text expressly contemplating a 48-hour master's inside a 60-hour program with no date limit, and an OR-clause (15 hours per week for six months) that preserves part-time accrual. The narrower planned-program question is with the board in writing. [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether a post-2009, 48-hour master's may complete the 60 with post-degree coursework (the packet's allowance is textually pre-2009-only), and how the 30-to-40-hours-per-week experience gate treats part-time practice.]
The path

Pennsylvania's education structure is route (b) of its own statute, and it is built for exactly this degree: 'a planned program of 60 semester hours or 90 quarter hours of graduate coursework in counseling or a field determined by the board... to be closely related — including a 48-semester-hour or 72-quarter-hour master's degree.' A 72-quarter master's is the case the route contemplates, and the route by construction requires more than the master's — post-degree supplementation is its structure, not an inference. Psychology is expressly a closely related field; the NCE is on Pennsylvania's accepted list (the NCMHCE is not). The genuinely open question is narrower and is with the board in writing: whether the additional 18 quarter hours must belong to a 'planned program.' The experience side needs a real audit: 1,500 of the 3,000 supervised hours must be direct service, all post-master's, over two to six years.

When it opens

After ~12 added semester credits (career among them, if your electives lack it) — with the planned-program question answered in writing first — and an experience log that clears the 1,500-direct-hour floor.

Exam

NCE.

Education

Sixty semester / 90 quarter total including a 48-semester/72-quarter master's (met exactly); content areas per §49.2 as the board's FAQ restates them; no CACREP requirement, no syllabi, no credential evaluation anywhere in the applicant materials. The open written question: whether post-degree credits must sit inside a 'planned program' or may simply accumulate.

Where this law comes from

The §49.13 rule text carries the note that the section was amended October 10, 2014, effective 10/11/2014, at 44 Pa.B. 6557, under section 6(2) of the Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Professional Counselors Act (63 P.S. §1906(2)).

Before acting
  • Experience counts in either of two patterns — a single setting at 30 to 40 hours per week for at least three months, OR at least 15 hours per week for at least six months. The second clause is what makes part-time practice viable here; audit your log against it, plus the 1,500-direct floor and the two-to-six-year span.
  • Supervision is a ratio with an individual floor: 2 hours per 40 of experience, at least half individual; supervisors must have been licensed where the supervision occurred.
  • Citation note: the content areas live in §49.2 (the FAQ restates them). Pennsylvania does not list the NCMHCE — NCMHCE-only licensees have an exam problem here, the mirror of Indiana.
  • Act 41's practical gifts stand: a provisional license to practice while completing requirements, and a 2-of-5-years recency test.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 49 Pa. Code §49.13 complete: route (3)(ii) expressly contemplates a 48/72 master's inside a 60/90 planned program with no 2009 limitation; both experience patterns, the 2-per-40 supervision ratio, and the 2-to-6-year window all verified verbatim. §3111 read in the 8/19 sweep.

LPC · 49 Pa. Code §§49.1–49.18; 63 Pa.C.S. §3111
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20: whether the §440.094 temporary credential is actually issued to counselors, including the telehealth-only mode. Same day, the DSPS service desk replied in writing (Office Operations Associate, Division of Professional Credential Processing): the question was routed to the credentialing team as a tracked support case in the LicensE system, with a stated review target of about 10 calendar days; further questions go through the LicensE Request Support form, not email. Routing only — the substantive questions remain unanswered, so nothing in this entry changes yet.] Application-packet pass 2026-08-20: the reciprocity packet's three items (read in full) contain no education documents — the forms-versus-rule conflict this entry flagged is now documented at the form-field level.
The path

Validation improved Wisconsin's picture: the reciprocity rule itself (MPSW 11.04) conditions licensure only on a substantially equivalent out-of-state credential, a clean discipline history, and Wisconsin's statutes-and-rules exam — it says nothing about transcripts or curriculum forms. The conflict lives in the agency's downloadable forms, which do request them. And the education rule (MPSW 14.01(3)) permits up to 18 credit hours completed outside the degree program, not necessarily post-degree.

When it opens

Possibly at reciprocity on the packet's own three items (plus the jurisprudence exam) — the statute-says-may versus rule-says-shall split and the DSPS ticket now pending decide how bankable that is. The §440.094 temporary credential bridges practice while any application pends.

Exam

NCE accepted.

Education

Two doors with different document sets, side by side at last. Reciprocity (the door to take): a three-item packet — application, license verification sent by Washington, and a $75 open-book Wisconsin statutes-and-rules exam at 85% — with no transcript, no education worksheet, no course descriptions, no supervision affidavit; the test compares Washington's rules to Wisconsin's, never your transcript. The standard door: the 60-hour equivalency worksheet across the rule's named areas — and the worksheet itself is defective, duplicating one mandatory area across two sections while omitting another entirely.

Before acting
  • The reciprocity packet reviews states, not transcripts — three items, none academic. Whether the Section grants it (statute 'may') or must ('shall', per its own rule) is the open question riding the DSPS ticket.
  • The $75 jurisprudence exam is mandatory on reciprocity: open-book, 85% to pass, three-month window, retakes cost extra.
  • Keep the Washington license active — the board's own instructions require the out-of-state license to remain active until Wisconsin credentialing completes.
  • Application abandonment runs about 90 days after a deficiency request (not the one-year norm) — flagged from DSPS guidance rather than a counselor-specific document; confirm.
  • The education worksheet (if you end up on the standard door) is internally defective — it omits a mandatory content area; expect confusion and carry the rule.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — MPSW 11.04 complete: 'shall grant' on five conditions (credential, substantial equivalence, clean record, no disqualifying offenses, jurisprudence exam) with nothing academic among them, exactly as the entry reads it. The forms and §440.094 read in the sweep and packet audit; the DSPS ticket remains pending.

LPC · Wis. Stat. ch. 457; DSPS forms 1962/2239
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

A clean cure case: every hours requirement clears a WA record, the NCE is accepted, and no odd traps surfaced — just the 60-hour total plus career if your electives lack it.

When it opens

The day the coverage gaps are filled — for most MAP transcripts that is the career course and little else — no waiting period, no extra exam. The rule's 60/90 total still stands behind the form; treat the coverage test as the instrument and the total as the law.

Exam

NCE accepted.

Education

The operative applicant instrument tests coverage, not credits — 'At least one (1) course must be identified in each area,' no per-area minimums, no double-counting — across nine areas: practicum/internship, human growth and development, social and cultural diversity, helping relationships, group work, career development, assessment, research and program evaluation, and professional counseling orientation and ethics. The 60/90 total lives in the rule rather than on the form. No syllabi, no course descriptions, no notary — and on the reciprocity route, no supervisor-signed hours form at all (experience is self-reported).

Where this law comes from

Both chapter 11 rules carry the history 'Amended, Eff. 6/3/2015; Amended, Eff. 2/2/2016; Amended, Eff. 7/26/2019; Amended, Eff. 12/17/2021,' matching the Board's statement that its current rules were filed with the Secretary of State effective December 17, 2021.

Before acting
  • The board serves two fee figures simultaneously: the reciprocity packet read 2026-08-20 prints $419 ($375 + $39 + $5), while the application document linked from the same forms page (read 2026-08-21) prints $393 ($350 + $39 + $4). Confirm the figure with the board (WyoMHPLB@wyo.gov) before writing the check — both documents are live.
  • The board will not pre-review transcripts — you learn whether the coverage reading works only after the full file is in; budget for that uncertainty.
  • Fingerprint cards must be within six months of submission — get printed last.
  • No late renewal exists: miss the postmark and the license is void; lapse five years and you retake the exam.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 078-11 Wyo. Code R. 11-6 complete: a master's 'in professional counseling' + exam + good standing, 'upon approval of the board,' with the five-year discipline lookback; the Transcript Evaluation form (packet audit) is how the degree-title phrase gets operationalized for non-counseling-titled degrees.

LPC · Wyo. Stat. §33-38-101 et seq.
sources read 2026-08-21 · board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: whether Washington's pathway has been evaluated for substantial equivalence under rule ch. 6-A.] Application-packet pass 2026-08-20: worksheet mechanics, the internship surcharge correction, the career cap, and the supplementation conflict all read from the board's own forms.
The path

Maine's rules spell out an explicit supplementation cure (master's of 36–59 semester hours + added graduate coursework to 60), and a 1,000-hour alternative can rescue thin practicum documentation. The catch is the exam.

When it opens

Classes alone don't finish Maine: the worksheet plus the NCMHCE, with the exam passed BEFORE applying (Maine sequences it first) — or skip everything at license + 5 via the transcript-review bypass. And the internship arithmetic is a surcharge, not a rescue: a 900-hour internship buys the 3,000-hour experience tier; 600 hours buys the 4,000-hour tier.

Exam

both the NCE and the NCMHCE for the LCPC; the NCE is waivable for out-of-state applicants, the NCMHCE is not. NCMHCE-passers: Maine moves several tiers friendlier for you.

Education

The worksheet, precisely (REVISED 03/2025, read in full): ten core areas at 3+ graduate credits each — human growth and development; helping relationships (must cover counseling theories and skills); groups; measurement; research and evaluation; diagnosis and treatment; professional orientation; social and cultural foundations; practicum; and internship — plus a separate additional-areas section of at least 9 credits across at least two areas from a menu including lifestyle and career development (capped at 3), marriage and family, human sexuality, and supervision. Syllabi are required for every listed course, and the school itself must sign an Internship and Degree Verification Form certifying the internship was clinical. One conflict flagged rather than resolved: the rule permits supplementation to 60, while the applicant-facing degree language reads degree-bound — the cure's survival is a written question for the board.

Where this law comes from

The §13857 section history shows the licensure-by-endorsement paragraph (subsection 2, ¶E, keyed to 10 MRSA §8003-H) was added by PL 2021, c. 642, §41.

Before acting
  • The internship arithmetic is a surcharge, not a rescue: a 900-hour internship buys the 3,000-hour experience tier, and a 600-hour internship buys the 4,000-hour tier.
  • Career development caps at 3 credits in the additional-areas menu — a second career course buys nothing; spread the 9 menu credits across two-plus areas.
  • The school must sign the internship verification and syllabi are required per course — the same records-archaeology as Hawaii, plus a university signature.
  • The rule text itself, read in full, supports the cure twice over: §2(3) accepts a 36-to-59-hour master's plus supplemental graduate coursework 'to equal or exceed 60 semester hours overall,' and its tail lets a 60-hour degree with area deficiencies cure by 'such supplemental graduate level coursework as the board deems necessary.' Two constraints ride along: supplemental courses must come from a mental health counseling program at a regionally accredited institution, and the applicant-facing worksheet still carries degree-bound language — the written question to ask before enrolling is whether the worksheet follows the rule.
  • Family/intimate-partner-violence coursework can wait until first renewal; a conditional license can bridge while the exam pends.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — the board's worksheet and forms 2026-08-20 (packet pass); 02-514 CMR ch. 3 §2 complete 2026-08-20 (both supplementation doors verified in the rule text; the 1,000-hour alternative and internship tiers confirmed).

LCPC · 32 MRSA §13857; 02-514 CMR ch. 3
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-20, awaiting reply: which endorsement provisions govern and whether post-degree coursework can cure the credit total.]
The path

No universal-recognition law despite frequent claims, a rulebook whose cited endorsement rule doesn't exist, and an unpublished substantial-equivalency list — Montana's whole verdict hinges on one answer. The education rule, read in full, is degree-bound on its face: ARM 24.219.601 wants a degree 'that is at least 60 semester credits' (90 quarter), allows at most 12 semester (18 quarter) credits transferred into it, and still cites a repealed statute. That makes MCA 37-1-304(2) the cure's only statutory hook: when qualifications are not substantially equivalent, the board 'shall determine whether the deficiency can be addressed by the applicant's actual qualifications and work experience.'

When it opens

Still unknown until the board answers — but the pending query should now be framed around the form: may the Academic Summary Sheet list post-degree courses from a second institution in its per-row university column? A yes cures Montana; a no closes it.

Exam

Hours are friendly (Montana's direct-hours bar is one you already clear).

Education

Twelve content areas, at last named, on the mandatory Academic Summary Sheet (which 'will not be accepted in lieu of' — transcripts cannot replace it): counseling theory; counseling techniques; supervised experience; human growth and development; social and cultural foundations; the helping relationship; groups; life-style and career development; appraisal; research and evaluation; professional orientation; and advanced counseling practicum. No per-area minimums; a single total-credits line marked semester or quarter. CACREP graduates skip the table entirely. The degree-attachment question is narrowed but not settled: the form's stated purpose is to show 'your graduate program contains CACREP core courses,' yet it carries a per-row college/university column and an overflow line — structure that quietly accommodates courses from more than one institution.

Where this law comes from

ARM 24.219.601's history line ends 'AMD, 2024 MAR p. 279, Eff. 2/10/2024,' with authority and implementation tied to 37-1-131, MCA and HB 137 (2023).

Before acting
  • Reframe the in-flight query around the Academic Summary Sheet's own structure (the per-row university column), not the rule text — forms get straighter answers than statutes.
  • Get fingerprinted late: six months from the board's receipt of results to a complete application, or you print again.
  • Montana accepts whatever license-verification form Washington produces — no Montana-specific form to chase; but its own supervised-experience form assumes the supervisor will sign, so out-of-state hours need a willing signature or an alternative.
  • $200 to apply; renewal annual on December 31; the application body was last updated in 2021 — confirm the fee before paying.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — MCA 37-1-304 (the (2) mandatory deficiency review) and ARM 24.219.601 complete (degree-bound 60/90, the 12/18 transfer cap, 6-year currency, and the repealed-statute cross-reference), plus the board's forms in the packet pass.

LCPC · ARM 24.219.601; MCA Title 37 ch. 39
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing (TN Dept. of Health licensure staff, tracked service request, 2026-08-21): the reciprocity policy applies generally to a Washington licensee — but the answer's own document list preserves the education floor verbatim: 'If your graduate counseling degree is less than 60 hours earned you do not qualify.' Timing per the answer: the highest-level license held 'for at least the last two of three year[s].' NCE or NCMHCE accepted on base reciprocity; TN jurisprudence exam required; document set includes the Course Work Summary, two reference letters, birth certificate, notarized citizenship declaration, supervision verification, and a TN-coded background check ($210 fee). The 2026-08-20 caveat — do not plan around a reciprocity shortcut past the 60-hour floor — is confirmed, not overturned: the cure math stands.
The path

Sixty semester hours plus the NCMHCE, and Tennessee's reciprocity instruments are thin: two signed bilateral agreements (North Carolina and Kentucky — Washington is not one) plus a general 2019 board policy on out-of-state applicants. No universal licensure-recognition statute exists for counselors; the closest statute (63-22-103, as amended effective 7/1/2024) grants exam-free licensure only to marriage and family therapists.

When it opens

Two roads. The coursework road: the 60-hour cure plus the NCMHCE, with everything complete before filing (deficiency letters give 60 days before the file closes). The reciprocity road: the board's December 2019 policy is general, not bilateral — three of the last five years licensed at your state's highest independent level, plus the Tennessee jurisprudence exam, and the packet's reciprocity checklist asks for no transcript and no national exam score. But read the policy to its end: its final item requires the applicant to 'meet all other minimum statutory requirements' — so the 60 hours and the exams survive reciprocity; the route eases documentation, not requirements. The board email asks whether that reading is right; until it answers, plan on the coursework road.

Exam

NCMHCE required — the one Southern state that forces it.

Education

Career development appears nowhere in Tennessee's coursework instrument. The eleven categories on the Course Work Summary, none with per-area minimums, inside a 60-semester-hour total: theories of human behavior, learning and personality; abnormal behavior and psychopathology; theories of counseling and psychotherapy; evaluation and appraisal procedures; group dynamics; counseling techniques; multicultural counseling; ethics; research; use of the DSM; and treatment and treatment planning. The list is psychopathology-shaped — a clinical MAP transcript covers more of it than the career-centric states. One favorable detail from the rule itself: the MHSP designation's 9-hour diagnosis cluster may be completed 'either during the course of a graduate degree or as postgraduate work' (0450-01-.04(4)(c)3) — express postgraduate supplementation, at least for that cluster.

Where this law comes from

Tenn. Code Ann. §63-22-103 was amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts ch. 700, §1, effective July 1, 2024 (original Acts 1984, ch. 933, §4); rule 0450-01-.04 was last amended by a filing of January 7, 2014, effective April 7, 2014.

Before acting
  • Experience is the first Tennessee obstacle, before coursework: 1,500 of the 3,000 post-master's hours must be face-to-face client contact — audit your log against that before anything else.
  • CONFIRMED in the board's written answer 2026-08-21: reciprocity keeps the 60-hour education floor ('less than 60 hours earned you do not qualify') — the cure precedes any Tennessee filing. The answer's timing formulation is the highest-level license for the last two of three years.
  • Files close 60 days after a deficiency letter; educational requirements must be complete before the application date.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full — the 2019 reciprocity policy and board forms 2026-08-20 (packet pass); Tenn. Comp. R. 0450-01-.04 complete 2026-08-20 (the rule's reciprocity is mutual-agreement-based; MHSP exams NCE + NCMHCE + jurisprudence; the 9-hour cluster's postgraduate allowance verified).

LPC-MHSP · Tenn. Comp. R. 0450-01
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
The path

Licenses issued after the 2024 standard-change are measured against a 60-semester counseling degree and 2,250 direct hours — nearly double WA's minimum — and the board counts nothing you've done since licensure. Aging never helps.

When it opens

Only a discretionary associate-level provisional license exists.

Exam

NCE is exactly what Alabama wants — the exam is the one friendly fact.

Education

60-hour era applies to this cohort's license dates; the direct-hours wall is the true killer.

Before acting
  • An internal inconsistency between the rule (application date) and the board's chart (issuance date) is worth raising in writing if Alabama ever matters.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: no such statute; Alabama's endorsement provision is discretionary and its rule affirmatively re-imposes the state's education and hours requirements.
Sources (Opus agent (8/19 sweep, with revision-date pin-cites to the 6/14/25 rules), spot-checked by Fable; the Alabama admin-code site is JS-gated to direct fetch, so no independent Fable re-read exists. Closed-tier stakes are the lowest in the guide.)

Opus agent (8/19 sweep, with revision-date pin-cites to the 6/14/25 rules), spot-checked by Fable; the Alabama admin-code site is JS-gated to direct fetch, so no independent Fable re-read exists. Closed-tier stakes are the lowest in the guide.

LPC · Ala. Admin. Code 255-X-10
board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

Kentucky's regulation names psychology-titled degrees as unacceptable, by name, (201 KAR 36:070 §1(3)) and bars remediation — the one state where the MAP degree title itself is fatal, independent of hours or coursework.

When it opens

None by licensure; compact privilege after the cohort cure + go-lives — and remember a privilege supports remote practice from Washington only; it is never a path to moving there.

Exam

Irrelevant given the title bar.

Education

Unfixable by coursework — the exclusion is categorical.

Before acting
  • An untested paper reading closes this state; if Kentucky ever matters to you, a board inquiry costs nothing. What the current text says (verified verbatim 2026-08-19): Section 1(3) lists psychology among degrees that 'shall not be accepted,' Section 7(2) bars remedial work for those degrees, and Section 2(2) separately requires a CACREP-accredited degree for everyone whose grandfather window closed in 2020.
  • Don't spend money on Kentucky-specific coursework — the exclusions are categorical on paper.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: Kentucky has no such statute — the 2026 bill named for one (HB 458) died in committee, as did its 2023 predecessor.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the current regulation was read verbatim on 2026-08-19

LPCC · 201 KAR 36:070 §1(3), §7(2)
sources read 2026-08-19 · entry updated 2026-08-20
The path

The 60 hours must sit inside a degree program whose catalog says it trains counselors — post-degree aggregation likely doesn't count — plus 4,500 experience hours and a nine-area audit. Structural, not curable.

When it opens

Compact privilege after the cohort cure + go-lives is the only realistic door — and remember a privilege supports remote practice from Washington only; it is never a path to moving there.

Exam

NCE accepted — not the problem.

Education

Program-bound 60: confirm with the committee before spending anything, but expect no.

Before acting
  • An NJ license is required even for telehealth into NJ — no registration workaround.
  • Corrected 2026-08-19: New Jersey's bar is a 60-semester-hour floor plus a degree-in-counseling title bind written into statute (N.J.S.A. 45:8B-40(c)) — not program accreditation; the board's rule even has an express non-CACREP alternative. The general endorsement statute (45:1-7.5) covers this board but is equivalence-conditioned, so it cannot reach past the statutory floor.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — N.J.A.C. 13:34-12.1 complete: three years' active practice, the CACREP door at (c), the non-CACREP door at (d) with the catalog-purpose test and the 60-semester/80-quarter program-bound total, 4,500 hours at (f), NCE at (g). The structural closure holds on the rule's own text.

LPC · N.J.A.C. 13:34-12.1
sources read 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing, 2026-08-21 (the board's senior administrator): “Yes, there is a pathway of Examination for those disapproved jurisdictions. However, the requirements will need to be met.” The disapproved listing bars the expedited shortcut, not every door — but the standard Examination route carries the full requirements this entry describes (both exams for the LPCC, 3,000 direct hours, the education standards), so the closure holds for this cohort on the standard route's own walls.
The path

New Mexico's friendly reputation is obsolete for this cohort: Washington is named on the disapproved-jurisdiction list for expedited licensure — for both the LPCC and LMHC — 'on the grounds that the education, training, or examination requirements for licensure are not consistent with New Mexico's minimum requirements' (16.27.24.8 NMAC, effective 1/18/2023, verified verbatim 2026-08-19). The LPCC also requires both the NCE and NCMHCE plus 3,000 direct hours.

When it opens

None realistic for this cohort.

Exam

Both exams required.

Education

Moot given the disapproved listing.

Before acting
  • The non-expedited question is resolved (board answer 2026-08-21): an Examination pathway exists for disapproved jurisdictions, with the full standard requirements — the list closes the shortcut; the requirements close the door for this cohort.
  • An earlier version asserted the old five-year reciprocity 'was repealed'; that could not be sourced and was removed 2026-08-19.
  • Hardened 2026-08-19: the board's disapproved-jurisdiction rule (16.27.24.8 NMAC) now names Washington by name, for both the LMHC and LPCC levels, as 'not consistent with New Mexico's minimum requirements.'
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the disapproved lists were read verbatim on 2026-08-19

  • 16.27.24.8 NMAC (eff. 1/18/2023; Washington on both the LPCC (B)(1)(a) and LMHC (A)(1)(b) disapproved lists — read verbatim 2026-08-19) — https://srca.nm.gov/parts/title16/16.027.0024.html (verified 2026-08-19)
  • 16.27.16.12(B) NMAC (surviving cross-reference to licensure by credential or reciprocity)
  • 16.27.24 NMAC, Counselors and Therapists — Expedited Licensure (incl. 16.27.24.7 definitions, 16.27.24.8 list of disapproved licensing jurisdictions naming Washington, 16.27.24.10-.12 procedures), New Mexico State Records Center & Archives — https://www.srca.nm.gov/parts/title16/16.027.0024.html (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
  • NMSA 1978, § 61-1-31.1, Expedited licensure; issuance — current text with amendment history (Laws 2016, ch. 19, § 1; 2020, ch. 6, § 4; 2022, ch. 39, § 7; 2023, ch. 190, § 22) and annotations describing the 2022 and 2023 amendments — https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/chapter-61/article-1/section-61-1-31-1/ (verified 2026-08-19; read-in-full)
LPCC · 16.27.24.8 NMAC
sources read 2026-08-19 · board asked 2026-08-20 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
The path

The CACREP requirement attaches to the degree program itself and keys to application date — post-degree coursework can't confer program accreditation, so the cure buys nothing here.

When it opens

No realistic route for a MAP degree; compact privilege after the cohort cure + go-lives is the only door — and remember a privilege supports remote practice from Washington only; it is never a path to moving there.

Exam

NCE fully sufficient — the exam was never the problem.

Education

CACREP-or-equivalent program accreditation: structurally unavailable to this degree.

Before acting
  • Psychopharmacology is also named — moot given the accreditation bar.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: North Carolina's new recognition statute (N.C.G.S. §93B-15.3, S.L. 2025-61, effective 2025-10-01) excludes all Chapter 90 health-care practitioners — which is where LCMHCs live — and is limited to licensees from five neighboring states besides.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — N.C.G.S. §90-336 complete: (b2) keys to application date (on or after July 1, 2022) and requires a degree from a CACREP-accredited institution with the regional-accreditation alternative dropped entirely — the closure is even cleaner in the text than the entry states.

LCMHC · N.C.G.S. §90-336(b2)
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-20 · entry updated 2026-08-20
CORROBORATED: Board answer, in writing, 2026-08-21: 97-02-01-04 reciprocity “does not apply to the LPCC License” — the LPCC is a specialty added to a held LPC (60 graduate semester credits with named courses, 700 practicum hours, 3,000 post-master’s supervised hours with 100 by an LPCC, three references, NCMHCE). LPC applications, “reciprocity or standard,” are each “reviewed for academic requirements, test results and individual supervision.” The closure holds — now on the board’s own words rather than a paper reading. Earlier revision note: the exam-mechanism framing was rewritten 2026-08-19 from the current chapter.
The path

Board answer (2026-08-21) reframed the mechanism: 97-02-01-04 reciprocity reaches only the base LPC — “The reciprocity law you referenced does not apply to the LPCC License.” The LPCC is a specialty layered onto a held LPC (“technically the LPC becomes the LPCLPCC”): 60 graduate semester credits including abnormal psychology/psychopathology and clinical counseling skills, 700 practicum hours, two years (3,000 hours) of post-master’s supervised clinical experience with 100 hours supervised by an LPCC, three clinical references, and a passing NCMHCE. Nor is LPC reciprocity a shortcut: “each application is reviewed for academic requirements, test results and individual supervision” against the board’s Academic Requirements — where the education rule’s degree-title test (programs “identified specifically as counseling programs” in the graduate bulletin) closes the door for a psychology-titled degree.

When it opens

No formula unlocks it: the degree-title academic review runs on every route — “reciprocity or standard application” — and the LPCC layer adds a 60-semester-credit floor plus the NCMHCE on top of a held LPC.

Exam

Two layers: the NCE covers the base-LPC exam element, but the LPCC specialty requires a passing NCMHCE — no NCE-only path to the clinical title.

Education

Degree-title test: uncurable for a psychology-titled degree.

Before acting
  • The ‘substantially the same requirements’ review is discretionary, not codified — and the 2026-08-21 board answer shows even that review sits behind the per-application academic screen, so the closure is board-described, not merely inferred.
  • Universal-recognition check 2026-08-19: North Dakota enacted a recognition chapter (N.D.C.C. ch. 43-51.1, SB 2395, effective 2025-08-01), but it switches itself off for any board in an effective interstate compact — and this board is a Counseling Compact member — and its education clause defers to board-determined methods anyway.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: the current chapter was read directly on 2026-08-19

LPCC · N.D. Admin. Code 97-02-01-04 (reciprocity), 97-02-01-01, 97-02-01-02
sources read 2026-08-19 · board asked 2026-08-21 · board answered 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21
HYPOTHESIS: [Board query sent 2026-08-21 to the health department's licensing unit (the published inquiry channel; the board has no direct inbox): whether any endorsement/equivalency review exists for a non-CACREP degree.] Re-tiered 2026-08-20 from coursework-plus to closed by the application-packet pass: the hours-after-60-credits sequencing is printed on the application twice, the 24 practicum/internship credits are structural, and the discretionary endorsement is absent from the packet. A written board answer saying otherwise would change this.
The path

Closed on the application's own text, which prints the trap twice: 'These hours are to be accrued after 60 credits are completed,' with 'After 60 Credits' stamped inside the experience grid. A post-hoc cure does not finish Rhode Island; it restarts it — coursework first, then 2,000 supervised hours all over again, then the NCMHCE. Add the second structural bar the packet surfaced: 24 semester credits of practicum and internship (12 each) inside the coursework requirement, which a MAP transcript cannot retroactively grow. And no discretionary exam-free endorsement appears anywhere in the packet.

When it opens

Never, for anyone whose supervised hours predate the cure — and the sequencing trap is in the rule itself, not just the application: 216-RICR-40-05-11.3.2(A)(1)(c) requires the 60/90 credits 'prior to beginning post graduate experience and supervised case work hours.' The rule's endorsement provision (11.3.9) is written — but it recognizes only a CACREP-accredited 60-semester-hour degree as equivalent, which closes it for this degree as firmly as the by-exam route. Asking the board costs nothing; plan nothing on it.

Exam

NCMHCE (NCE not accepted) unless the discretionary endorsement applies.

Education

Nine blocks on the Core Curriculum form: helping relationships and counseling theory at 9 credits minimum, then human growth and development, social and cultural foundations, group counseling, lifestyle and career development, appraisal, research and program evaluation, and professional orientation at 3 each, plus electives — inside a 60-semester/90-quarter total that also demands 12 semester credits of practicum and 12 of internship. The credit-denominated field experience is the uncurable part.

Where this law comes from

The rule page records the active version as an Amendment effective 05/15/2023, promulgated under R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 5-63.2 to implement the statutory amendments that created the associate-level licenses.

Before acting
  • The timing clause is now verified at both levels: the application prints it twice, and the rule text itself (11.3.2(A)(1)(c)) requires the credits before the post-graduate hours begin.
  • Applications expire one year from receipt.
  • If Washington's original supervision documentation exists on file with DOH, the packet allows it to be sent in lieu of chasing old supervisors — useful knowledge for other states too.
Sources (Fable)

Fable: decisive texts read in full 2026-08-20 — 216-RICR-40-05-11 complete: the credits-before-experience sequencing is in the rule itself (11.3.2(A)(1)(c)), and the written endorsement provision (11.3.9) recognizes only CACREP 60-semester degrees. Application text read in the packet audit.

LMHC · 216-RICR-40-05-11; R.I. Gen. Laws §5-63.2-15
sources read 2026-08-20 · board asked 2026-08-21 · entry updated 2026-08-21

The accreditation problem: the one nobody can cure

First, the finding, stated plainly: the MAP holds neither CACREP nor MPCAC accreditation. The CACREP half has been this guide’s premise from the first page — the degree is an M.A. in Psychology, and Seattle University’s CACREP-accredited counseling programs sit in a different college. The MPCAC half was the live question, because MPCAC is the accreditor built for exactly this kind of degree — masters-level psychology programs that train counselors (Bastyr’s counseling-psychology M.A. in Kenmore holds it) — and a few state rules accept CACREP-or-equivalent language that MPCAC can satisfy. Checked August 19, 2026, against all four of MPCAC’s status directories (accredited, under review, deferred, previously accredited): Seattle University appears on none of them. Why this deserves its own section: of the four problems, accreditation is the only one that cannot be cured at the individual level. Hours can be added, a course can be taken, an exam can be sat — but accreditation attaches to the program in the years it operated, and nothing a graduate does afterward confers it. Program accreditation is also never retroactive: were the program accredited at some future date, that would not reach a 2022–2024 diploma — accreditation attaches to the years a program operated, and MPCAC’s own review pipeline runs one to three years besides. And the trend runs one way. This map records the ratchet in real time: North Carolina keyed its CACREP requirement to applications on or after July 1, 2022; Delaware rebuilt its coursework review around full CACREP standards in late 2025; Michigan filed rules in January 2026 adopting the CACREP 2024 standards; Mississippi draws its line at post-2017 degrees. States adopt accreditation language and key it to your application date, not your graduation date — which means a state open to you today can close before you file. That is the strongest argument in this document for acting early: every verdict on this map is a snapshot, and the direction of drift is against this degree. One more fact for context: Seattle University's current MAP is a 90-quarter-credit program — the university's own program page listed 90 credits as of August 2026 — which meets the compact's education floor. Later cohorts will not face the credit gap this guide is organized around; degrees conferred earlier keep the credit totals they were conferred with, and that is this guide's whole reason for existing.

Two housekeeping rules, whatever you pursue

Rule one: the Washington license is the keystone — never let it lapse. Every open pathway in this record — endorsement, reciprocity, the years-licensed formulas, all six telehealth registrations, and any future compact privilege — presumes an active, unencumbered Washington LMHC. A lapsed home license collapses the whole map to one option: curing the degree from scratch. Renew Washington first, before any new state, every time. Rule two: licenses have carrying costs. Each new state brings its own renewal fees, its own CE requirements (sometimes state-specific mandatory courses), and occasionally a jurisprudence exam. Collect the states you will use, not the states you can get — and if you stop using one, retire it deliberately (states treat a lapse and a voluntary surrender differently) rather than by accident.

Universal-recognition laws: the full sweep

About twenty states have passed some version of a universal-license-recognition law since 2019 — statutes that say a board shall license you on the strength of your out-of-state license, usually after a year, usually on establishing residency, without re-grading your education. Where they work, they are the single most powerful instrument on this map: they are why Mississippi, Utah, Missouri and West Virginia sit where they sit, and on August 19, 2026 every remaining jurisdiction was swept for one. The sweep re-tiered four states — Indiana out of the closed tier entirely (its mandatory reciprocity statute now seats it among the open states, with an exam badge marking its NCMHCE-only wall), Nebraska and Kansas to conditional one-year routes, and Colorado, which then kept moving: within a day of the sweep, a written exchange with the board's own licensing specialist carried it all the way to the open tier (its entry tells that story) — and re-described several more. It also catalogued the four ways these laws fail counselors, worth knowing before you rely on any of them. Health-care carve-outs: Georgia's names professional counselors as excluded; Indiana's general law carves them out (a profession-specific statute rescues it). Compact switch-offs: North Dakota's law disables itself for compact-member boards. Equivalence conditions: New Jersey, Wyoming, South Dakota, Maine and Pennsylvania passed laws that sound universal but let the board re-impose its own education standard through a 'substantially equivalent' finding — those are not bypasses. And deferral instead of waiver: Arkansas grants the license first and then gives you twelve months to meet the full education requirement anyway. One more failure mode sits outside the statutes entirely: boards that ignore their own law. Kansas and Nebraska have Mississippi-grade statutes and no application form; South Dakota's board cites the old statute as if the mandate never passed. Every universal-recognition entry on this map distinguishes what the law says from what the board does, and the untested ones say so plainly. Finally, the fine print that repeats across nearly all of them: most require establishing residency (these are relocation laws, not collect-from-home laws), and most stamp the resulting license with a poison pill — valid in that state only, never compact-eligible.

Queries in flight: what the boards have been asked

This record does not wait passively for corrections. Direct questions are pending with the boards themselves, and each answer lands in the entry it concerns, quoted and dated, with the changelog moving in step. Every jurisdiction on the map has now been asked, is staged to be asked, or takes questions only by phone or application. The state of play as of August 21, 2026:

Answered

Awaiting a reply

Staged, not yet sent

No async channel

The NCC: most of the cohort is one course away

NBCC's National Certified Counselor is worth understanding as a cohort asset: it feeds several states' endorsement routes (Delaware's and DC's expressly), and most MAP grads are closer than the folklore suggests. The facts, verified against NBCC's governing policy (revised April 30, 2026): there is no CACREP requirement — the widely-circulated 'CACREP-only from 2027' deadline was announced in 2014 for 2022, postponed twice, never written into the eligibility policy, and the April 2026 revision deleted CACREP from the degree clauses entirely. The requirements that DO apply: 48 semester / 72 quarter hours (exactly what MAP grants — zero margin, so verify your transcript's total), nine content areas (career development is the one most transcripts lack — one course cannot double-count two areas), at least 10 quarter hours of supervised field experience (the standard MAP internship sequence clears it — verify your own transcript), and a degree review for non-counseling-titled degrees (discretionary, content-based, with an appeals process). A full state license waives the post-graduate experience requirement outright, and an NCE already passed for licensure transfers — $250, no retake. The smart sequence, corrected: NBCC offers no formal pre-application review — the application itself is the review, a six-to-eight-week coursework read by the certification department — so file the application first and let its reviewers name your exact gaps before you pay tuition for any course; a modest application fee is cheap insurance against buying the wrong class. certification@nbcc.org answers eligibility questions along the way, and documents can be sent early (they are reviewed in the order received). Then take the career course, if the review says you need it, as for-credit graduate coursework.

Where to take a make-up course (verified August 2026)

Requirements for any make-up course: graduate-level, for-credit, on an official transcript from a regionally accredited institution — CE hours never count. Verified options for single-course non-degree enrollment from CACREP-accredited counseling programs: Capella (COUN5279 Life Planning & Career Development, 4 quarter credits, ~$2,275 all-in, asynchronous with weekly deadlines, quarterly starts) and Walden (COUN6753 Career Counseling, 5 quarter credits, ~$2,800, 10-week terms, effectively add-to-cart enrollment). Liberty (COUC522, ~$2,000, 8-week asynchronous, semester credits — structurally ideal for the compact math) is cheaper IF its Special-Student status actually permits counseling-course registration — unverified, one phone call. Adams State, the school most licensure guides still recommend, closed its counseling courses to non-degree students — verified on their own site. Capella is the only verified one-stop if you pursue the full 18-quarter compact cure (career, appraisal, addictions, research all sold individually at 4 quarter credits each — note four courses is 16 quarter credits, so the 18-quarter compact target means a fifth course for most transcripts): roughly $9,100–11,400 total depending on course count. Prices verified early August 2026 (Adams State's closure re-verified 2026-08-19) and will drift.

The validation ledger, and what is still open

What has actually been tested, newest first. VALIDATED: Idaho's $35 telehealth registration (applied late July 2026, issued 2026-08-06). IN PROGRESS: Florida MOBILE endorsement (filed 2026-08-03, pending - the associate-practice question rides with it). CORROBORATED: Idaho (licensing specialist, in writing, 2026-08-21: endorsement has no time-frame requirement, the WA LMHC is deemed equivalent to the clinical LCPC, and the document set is license numbers + photo ID — re-tiered +5 years to OPEN on the answer); New Mexico (senior board administrator, in writing, 2026-08-21: an Examination pathway exists for disapproved jurisdictions — the listing bars only the expedited shortcut — with full standard requirements; closure stands on the standard route's own walls); North Dakota (board admin, in writing, 2026-08-21: the reciprocity rule does not reach the LPCC — a specialty atop a held LPC — and every LPC application is academically reviewed); Massachusetts (board staff, in writing, 2026-08-21: three years on the full independent license only, 'practicing full time'; post-degree coursework to 60 confirmed); Minnesota (board staff, in writing, 2026-08-21: the pre-approval list is current, the clock is full-license-only, and 48 credits license with four years to reach 60 — upgrading the list's 2024 internal date); Ohio (board inbox, in writing, 2026-08-21: no one-year wait, and the NCE suffices for the LPCC — re-tiered to open); South Dakota (program manager, in writing, 2026-08-21: supervised associate time counts toward the three years — re-tiered to open); Tennessee (licensure staff, in writing, 2026-08-21: the reciprocity policy applies generally, the 60-hour floor survives in the document list); Alaska (division examiner, in writing, 2026-08-20: board operating normally in its wind-down year; the August 21 rules accept out-of-state post-graduate supervision); Hawaii (program office, in writing, 2026-08-20: courses combine within areas, post-degree coursework fills gaps); Oklahoma (board, in writing, 2026-08-20: endorsement requires no traditional academic review); Minnesota (the board's published reciprocity list pre-approves the WA LMHC); Arizona (credentialing specialist, in writing, 2026-08-20: the one-year clock is full-license-only, and endorsement does not review program or hours); Colorado (the board's license specialist, three written answers, 2026-08-20: endorsement applies, the education check is a conferral-only transcript, and associate-level practice counts toward the two-year practice attestation); Louisiana (credentialing staff, in writing, 2026-08-20: one year governs, no education review - and the year runs on the full license only); Oregon (board staff, Aug 2026: the 3-year clock runs from full licensure - associate time does not count); Nevada (staff, 2026-08-11: apply via their reciprocity route; NO provisional licenses in practice despite the statute; Certemy platform); New Hampshire (all requirements re-verified live 2026-08-07, packet built, not yet mailed). Still open, where any one graduate's written answer helps everyone: (1) WA DOH: does post-degree graduate coursework count toward the compact's 90-quarter threshold, and how would an existing licensee be re-flagged? (2) Virginia: its old duration test was deleted effective July 2026, so the open question is now whether the rewritten rule is applied as smoothly as it reads. (3) Utah: will DOPL exercise its exam discretion against endorsement applicants holding only the NCE? (4) Illinois: settled unfavorably by the rule's own text — the 60-hour floor keys to the application date ('individuals applying for licensure' beginning July 1, 2026), no grandfather. (5) Wisconsin: the conflict is now precise — the reciprocity packet files no education documents at all while the statute says 'may' and the rule says 'shall'; the department's tracked case will answer which governs. (6) South Carolina: confirmation that its strikingly bare endorsement rule is applied as written (Oklahoma's was confirmed in writing 2026-08-20: no traditional academic review on endorsement). Ask one, get it in writing, email it in - the record updates.

How this was researched, and how far to trust it

Built from primary sources wherever obtainable (mirrors are noted where an official copy could not be fetched) — statutes, administrative rules, board applications and published guidance — researched late July through mid-August 2026. The initial research was done by Claude Fable (Anthropic's extended-reasoning model), reading and analyzing sources directly. When the scope grew to all fifty states, British Columbia, and D.C., Fable coordinated teams of Claude Opus sub-agents to research entries in parallel while conserving the token budget. Most refinement since — board-reply corrections, status upgrades, editorial passes — has been Fable, with Opus agents spun up for targeted sweeps (the universal-recognition analysis, the adversarial review, the application-packet audit). Each state entry carries its own source list and names which model did the reading — 'Fable' means the decisive texts were read directly; 'Opus agent' means a sub-agent researched them and Fable spot-checked. What is not preserved: the full research trail — every page visited and rejected. What you see is what was cited. Statuses tell you how far past paper each pathway has been tested: HYPOTHESIS (paper-verified only), CORROBORATED (a board answered an actual inquiry — quoted with date), VALIDATED (a real application proved the pathway), FILED · PENDING (an application is in adjudication). CONTRADICTED is folded into notes where board practice diverges from statute text (see Nevada's provisional-license line). Rules moved repeatedly during the research window; assume something here is already stale and verify with the board before filing anything. One editorial rule keeps this document readable as it ages: entry text always describes the current state of the law, never the history of this guide's understanding. Corrections are not silent — when a verdict or number changes, the change and its evidence are recorded in that entry's dated status note and in the changelog — but the reader should never have to excavate today's rule from the story of how it was learned. Each entry's card carries its own currency line — when its decisive sources were last read, when its board was last asked (an inquiry sent or a contact form submitted), when its board last answered in writing, and when the entry text last changed — so a reader can judge staleness state by state instead of trusting the document's overall date. Nearly every board has now been asked directly; the asked-but-unanswered gap between those two dates is itself information.

Changelog

Full history (64 earlier entries)